Re: Questions About Artistic Styles
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000 21:08:00 +0000, sara wallen <sar...@PLEASEREMOVETOREPLYwallen.as> wrote: >,-- ray...@number.net remarked: --- >| >| Much of your work is two-dimensional - like ancient Egyptian works. >| The is a more sophisticated trend toward 3rd dimension with >| perspective. >| >| Much of your work is a striving for formal realism - that is, you try >| to make a pic of an object that looks like the object. But there also >| are works that are more abstract and impressionistic. >'--- > >It's quite hard to be abstract without losing sight of what you're >trying to do. I think Valery S-v (post somewhere below/above) does some >excellent looking asciis which aren't trying to look realistic... > >.--- >| Somewhere in all this, there is a growing new wave school - hard to >| characterize. >'--- > >Elaborate? Ummm ... classical realism tries to make pictures of objects - and tries to replicate the object. The "new wave" is up to something very different - neo-punk bad boys, they are. Perhaps the world-views are reflected by your in-fighting. There is a surface argument about an "issue". There is a sub-surface argument between people with different "artistic objectives". This is little different than how we might imagine a classical painter would look at the Comic book art of Rauschenberg (?) - you know, pics from romance comics? They probably would not argue about art - the classicist would just simply hate Rauschenberg - perhaps visa versa. Consider the following 2 images: ..................................... ObASCII Movie Scene: () () || ,:::, || | (245trio3) () () || po op || | ____()___()_____|| p,",p - "Brains!" ||__________________| -A-M-C- ====()===()======' .i~o. `===================| -9-8- () ". .dgfhfgh.. .-~~-. .-~~-. | - () `..' ...sdlesterghsdf..~.-~~-..-~~-.~~| | () .sdfgdf(`dgamchdd`(dgfh.~.-~~-.~~| | | () .ofg') ( ) dfghfgf )( `fg|~~~~| | |_____ | ____()_______.dd( ( )( dgfhfgh ( ) (g| | |--'___.'|____| () ```) ) ( ) fhgjfgh ) ( )`| |--'____.'|.' '. () ( ( )( ghjhgkp( )(--`----'------'|.' '. () ) ) ( ) fjp (qpk )( )____________[.' '. () ( ( ) ( kp( )(kp( )( '. () ) ( )pk)( )pkp ( .ssss s. .sSs. .s.s. s. '.s. .s () ) ( kp( )( pk )ssss' `AM. S. .S S`S`S SS. .SS. S' () ( pk)( )kp `S. .S`C `SSSS .S S .S`S. S'`S.S () ()()() .kp( ( pk `S SSSS' .S`S' S' .S SSSSS .S SS' ()() () kp/ ) kp .S .S' .S S' S. S S' S' .S S' `S ()()()() .::;"' (";:. S' S' S' S `S S S S S' S S -- I am the one you warned me of. - BOC - Imaginos ......................................... | _ \ _ ^~ email:bateau at jupiterio.net | <')_,/ , ; \ >(')__, . ` ' , ,______________._ | (_~=/ \._`.'. \ (_~_/ _, '------:_______ ;==( *BANG* | ='- \=~_) ; \ ~^~~^~ ` (_~_/ | | `-\ \ *BANG* | ICQ:11367619 -'= \ ~^~~^~ `~' \_; ........................................... >.--- >| There are asian influences. There is a type of minimalism often in >| your sigs. >'--- > >I think when you say asian influences that you mean lots of geometric >patterns - probably because of the ease of using the forward and >backslashes / \, and that big straight-line thing |. The statements about Asian influence and minimalism should probably not be in the same paragraph. They are different, but perhaps related. About Asian - there is obviously "anime", with the reservation that anime is not simply about the "imaginary" objects - but also about style. I grew up in Japan, so I relate to images from Japanese advertising. Look, for example at: .-. __ _ .-. | ` / \ | / '.()--, joan stark | '._/ spu...@juno.com _| O _ O |_ =\ '-' /= ASCII Art Gallery jgs '-._____.-' http://www.ascii-art.com Right off the rice-based cereal box from Tokyo. Another example of Asian influence is in some of the landscapes and trees. Minimalism is another, but related, matter. There is the obvious minimalism dictated by the medium. But there is also variation in styles. Some pics use lots of ascii character codes (letters and numbers). Some use a lot of periods, comas, apostrophes, etc - more impressionistic, more pointalistic. Recognize that I am totally out of my league in this discussion. Does anybody else, but me, think about this stuff? Or do you folks just make pics? Your "art galleries" categorize images by the nature of the object - flowers, animals, etc. Should there be a gallery which categorizes by styles or techniques? rayo
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,644bc29b01e15570 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: ray...@number.net Subject: Re: Questions About Artistic Styles Date: 2000/11/06 Message-ID: <3a0...@news.flash.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 690444472 References: <3a0...@news.flash.net> <3a0...@news.flash.net> <177...@4ax.com> X-Complaints-To: abu...@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 973547290 207.214.217.15 (Mon, 06 Nov 2000 15:48:10 CST) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 15:48:10 CST Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.