Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 6 Nov 2000.
Re: HTML-ish Ascii Art

Re: HTML-ish Ascii Art


Audio CDs wrote:
> 
> I've recently seen a new type of art, which I would call Ascii art 'cause i
> just don't know what other kind of art it is.  It's art in which you repeat
> a single sentence over and over again, but the only way you differentiate it
> by the different colour coding applied to the text through HTML.
> Here's an example of what i mean...
> http://members.home.com/diekenny
> If someone would tell me the name of the program or the site which can be
> used to make this kind of art - i'd appreciate it - 'cause i know it just
> ain't easy colour coding everything by hand.


MosASCII  beta 3 is located at http://elitemrp.net/mos/index.html played with beta 2 just
to see the result. It does a good 


--lgbeard

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,84d10f7273530ff1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: lgbeard <lgb...@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: HTML-ish Ascii Art
Date: 2000/11/06
Message-ID: <3A0...@bellsouth.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 690225200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <N9oN5.13643$4U6...@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news3.atl 973508709 209.214.119.105 (Mon, 06 Nov 2000 06:05:09 EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 06:05:09 EST
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post