Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 23 May 1994.
Re: rec.arts.scarecrow ?

Re: rec.arts.scarecrow ?

>If those Make.Money.Fast articles hadn't been posted, would Mike
>Jittlov have created his Big.Money.Fast parody?

Ahh, good point :). Mind you, the MMF posts get cross posted to virtually every
group you can think of, and all the moderation of r.a.a would do is mean that
we could miss seeing it on our favourite group, and the 55 follow-ups it gets.
Mike probably found it on alt.fan.mike-jittlov anyway ;).

I must admit that I voted YES for purely personal (and probably selfish)
reasons. But then thats the idea of a public vote. I like the thought of
having a rec. group, I like the thought of having possibly a larger user
base, and I like like the idea of possibly separating requests from an art
group (not that rec. would do that in any way). What I dont like is wading
through "crap" (disclaimer: these are my thoughts and I do not try to imply
that everyone on this group thinks the same way), hoping to find the occational
"art" related posting.

Having said that, if I hadn't talked to Bob quite a lot with regard to
moderation, I would have been a lot less comfortable in voting YES to
the moderation aspect. Remember that the moderator is not doing it for
himself, or for the group, he does it for the people who read the group.
If people like to see a certain thing posted which would otherwise have
been cut, then I can only imagine that he'd be quite happy to go along
with that. After all, it means less work for him.

A little word about requests. In no way am I trying to say that people
should request all they like, when they like. But the groups that I'm
aware of created a separate .request group for the simple reason that
they can take over a group (as we've seen here to an extent). Of course
being able to request ascii art is *very* handy, but reading them is
NOT. Althought it's just a matter of hitting "n" (on my system anyway),
it's not always readily apparent that it is a request (some people dress
them up :), and also, due to the huge number of requests here, there
is still a significant time-based objection.

Remember, if r.a.a (mod) passes, then a.a-a will still be here so people
can request *whatever they like*. There'll still be people fulfilling
the requests.

Something to think about anyway.
Row.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6fef76e7b764a2b1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-23 18:44:30 PST
Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!giaeb!dljar1
From: dlj...@giaeb.cc.monash.edu.au (Dwayne Jarvis)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: rec.arts.scarecrow ?
Date: 23 May 94 12:02:52 GMT
Organization: Monash University
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <dljar1.769694572@giaeb>
References: <134...@anon.penet.fi> <FLE...@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu> 	<dljar1.769607381@giaeb> <FLE...@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: giaeb.cc.monash.edu.au
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #4 (NOV)
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post