Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 24 May 2003.
Re: [PIC] 'Perl rules' from perlmonks.org

Re: [PIC] 'Perl rules' from perlmonks.org

On 2003-05-24, 
 Jaap Karssenberg <j.g...@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
>
> P.S. vim syntax highlighting really works ;)

Yes, it's cool, but it doesn't get me nearer to understanding this code! 
:)

Obascii:

V   V IIIII M   M
 V V    I   M M M
  V   IIIII M   M

(Bit of bad M :\ )

-- 
Mark Hill <mar...@yahoo.co.uk>
C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success
    -- Dennis M. Ritchie

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b479553a860e8a94
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-23 17:16:29 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dsl-217-155-199-78.zen.co.UK!not-for-mail
From: Mark Hill <mar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: [PIC] 'Perl rules' from perlmonks.org
Date: 24 May 2003 00:16:28 GMT
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <200...@bubble.markhill.me.uk>
References: <200...@bubble.markhill.me.uk> <200...@student.utwente.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl-217-155-199-78.zen.co.uk (217.155.199.78)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1053735388 1455191 217.155.199.78 (16 [123679])
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4pl2 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:23265
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2003 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post