Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 26 Nov 1996.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ASCII AWARDS

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ASCII AWARDS

On Sun, 24 Nov 1996 03:30:07 +0100, Erik Kambestad Veland
<ekv...@online.no> wrote:

>Now here's an idea:

>I'm going to make an ASCII AWARDS to promote:

>WHAT DO YOU THINK?

This is one of the best ideas to come along in quite a while.

I'll vote.

At the same time, you should run a contest to name the award (the 'Ascar' is
way too obvious). The winner of the contest could get something fairly
simple like maybe world domination for 1 week.

Rules; it needs rules.

No campaigning
No buying votes
No ballot stuffing
No ballot box stuffing either
No lurid 'sweeps week' pandering
No paparazzi (or is that panzerotti? Pepperoni?)
No anchovies (just in case)

On a lighter note, Erik, I _really_ like it.

Alan

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,c31e271332854f16
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: ala...@netcom.ca (Alan Popow)
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ASCII AWARDS
Date: 1996/11/26
Message-ID: <329...@nntp.netcruiser>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 200772510
references: <329...@online.no>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Netcom Canada
x-netcom-date: Mon Nov 25 11:34:52 PM EST 1996
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: ala...@netcom.ca
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post