Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 31 Mar 1998.
Re: REQ: Burning Torch

Re: REQ: Burning Torch

In article <352...@news.demon.co.uk>, Naughty
<nat...@virtek.com> writes
>   .    )
>     ' ((
>   , ) | ) :
>    ( Y  (/.
>   . \  . X
>    ( .; /
>     d@p'
>    d@P
>   d@'
>  dP
>
>This one any use to you? Did you want it burning? Lying horizontal?
>Gripped firmly by a 'hero'? Did you want an ornamental looking one?
>
>QUOTE FROM THE HOLY FAQ SCRIPTURE:

<snip>
>:nathaN
Cheers Nathan,

This is great!  My apologies for my slip-up in Nettiquette :p
For clarity I wanted a burning tourch, 10 lines max, standing upright,
and on its own, with no hero's hand holding it. Ornamental or just plain
will do me fine. :]

Thanks again!

Kindred

     Kin...@ilovechocolate.com
     ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

http://ds.dial.pipex.com/kindred
....

"Once in a lifetime" was two minutes ago.  You missed it.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,7fbf44c8d9eb9a99
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Kindred <kin...@no.spam.net>
Subject: Re: REQ: Burning Torch
Date: 1998/03/31
Message-ID: <DRZ...@ybp17.pipex.dial.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 339528127
Distribution: world
References: <Rqy...@ybp17.pipex.dial.com> <352...@news.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Alien
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post