Re: Any good Tiggers?
From Peter Punk <ppu...@damnthatspam.chello.nl>
· alt.ascii-art
· 16 Nov 2000 00:00 · View full thread
· report
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:04:38 -0000, "Lee Derbyshire" <Lee...@CSI.Com>
provoked the following text:
> The only trouble is, I can't make him look happy without ruining it.
How 'bout this?
_ ___ _
(_:( ._. ):_)
=(( ))=
( u )
--
Peter Punk
\ /
---\\\\---
/ \
Draai je V3.0 al van de SETI@home client?
http://home.hetnet.nl/~setiathomegroep/index.html voor
tips, antwoorden, discussies. links, downloads en meer.
415wu/6998hrs
The Roman Rule: The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it.
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ac58aa76e9552bf4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: ppu...@damnthatspam.chello.nl (Peter Punk) Subject: Re: Any good Tiggers? Date: 2000/11/16 Message-ID: <0rm...@4ax.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 694498520 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <974...@news.demon.co.uk> <D8o...@4ax.com> <974...@news.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abu...@chello.nl X-Trace: Flipper 974412927 213.93.74.225 (Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:15:27 MET) Organization: Total Disorganisation MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:15:27 MET Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.