TALK - Help with this snake!?
From Bob Allison <bob...@gagme.wwa.com>
· alt.ascii-art
· 23 Apr 1994 19:15 · View full thread
· report
Way, way back, many years ago, in article <2palor$il...@netnews.upenn.edu>, The Enchanted Nrock <per...@eniac.seas.upenn.edu> inscribed in stone: >Hi -- it's me again -- the big bad ascii thief! An ASCII art thief! Wow, imagine finding one of those here! Why the nerve of the bloody rascule. I wouldn't have dreamed it possible. Someone who actually takes ASCII art from other sources and uses it. My my ... how shocking. Of course, none of the rest of us have ever been guilty of such a horrible offense. Although, if the truth were to be told, and ASCII theft were a crime, most of us would probably be hanging from the business end of a short ASCII rope. > Well, in my search for objects to make a NEW sig with, I came across >this nice looking snake in ScareCrow's (one of 'em) collection (was no name). >Anyway, can anybody reduce this (yet retaining its niceness). Like try and >make it about 10 lines? Please? Wouldn't want me to have to steal your sig, >now would you... heh heh heh... justkidding.... :) Here it is: Now about this snake. I think that before our convicted ASCII fellon is allowed to use it, we should probably take a few weeks to make sure it hasn't appeared in somebody's sig before. He may be trying to pull a fast one here. You can't trust these ASCII art poachers. They're somewhere between a child molester and a politician. If there's any room between those two. > /^\/^\ > _|__| O| >\/ /~ \_/ \ > \____|__________/ \ > \_______ \ > `\ \ \ > | | \ > / / \ > / / \\ > / / \ \ > / / \ \ > / / _----_ \ \ > / / _-~ ~-_ | | > ( ( _-~ _--_ ~-_ _/ | > \ ~-____-~ _-~ ~-_ ~-_-~ / > ~-_ _-~ ~-_ _-~ > ~--______-~ ~-___-~ Hmmm ... a snake ... appropriate for a sig snatcher. How about a Jolly Roger or a weasel? >Got caught for sig snatching, new sig in development - The Enchanted Nrock *:) Well he's learned his lesson. Which means that next time he's sure he won't get caught. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) -- /:\ /;:.\ //;:. \ ///;:.. \ __--"////;:... \"--__ --__ "--_____--" __-- """--_______--""" (` /` /| |\ |~ /` |\ /`\ | | | /~ \_/ \ \ | /_| |/ |- | |/ | | \ | | |__________/ \ __)\,/ | |\ [_ \, |\ \./ \|\| \_______ \ `\ \ \ | | \ / / \ / / \\ / / \ \ / / \ \ / / _----_ \ \ / / _-~ ~-_ | | ( ( _-~ _--_ ~-_ _/ | \ ~-____-~ _-~ ~-_ ~-_-~ / ~-_ _-~ ~-_ _-~ ~--______-~ ~-___-~ \|/ \|// \\|/ \||/ \|//
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,3d3249ed8e91a32c X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,8a7d0b138a508fb8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-04-23 12:15:49 PST Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!jobone!lynx.unm.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!mary.iia.org!rtp.vnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: bob...@gagme.wwa.com (Bob Allison) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: TALK - Help with this snake!? Date: 23 Apr 1994 14:15:49 -0500 Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services 312-282-8605 Lines: 83 Message-ID: <2pbs55$55...@gagme.wwa.com> References: <2palor$il...@netnews.upenn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.