Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 25 Sep 2001.
Re: Dead or alive...

Re: Dead or alive...

On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:44:14 -0000, anonymous@bogus_address.con enlightened us
with:

> 
> On 2001-09-24 now...@nowhere.co.uk said:
> 
>    >Why would you want to use DOS anyway? It's the worst OS there is.
> 
> Not so.  DOS is a small, relatively efficient O.S. ...unlike
> that bloated pointee-clickee abomination.
> 
> But more importantly, DOS allows the =user= to make the
> decisions about how he wants his machine to look, act and
> perform.  It's a much more 'down-to-the-metal' O.S., where
> the =user= is in control...not some megalomaniac in Redmond,
> Washington, U.S.A.
> 
> Besides, DOS is ten times faster than WinDoze on any given
> machine.
> 
> Plus, the DOS executable files for any productivity software
> programs are 20 to 50 times smaller than a comparable WinDoze
> program.  A 500 meg hard disk is =more= than sufficient for
> a DOS-based machine.  You simply don't need a mega-gigabyte
> drive.
> 
> And we haven't yet mentioned security.  I think we all know
> how 'secure' WinDoze is.  Not! :)
>  
>    >If you're going to use the console, at least use something decent
>    >like Linux.
> 
> Although it's a 'techie' O.S., and therefore not everyone's
> cup of tea, Linux is okay.  But it suffers from many of the
> same ailments that afflict WinDoze: bloat, hogging of system
> resources, etc., plus a relative dearth of software choices.

How does software choice for Linux compare with that for MSDOS? And not just out
of date software (e.g. web browsers have to have reasonable javascript & java
support plus CSS...)

-- 
 o
 |\ _[]
 L_ ===    Stuart Moore
 []\, stm

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,9ba64c635b2340c1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-25 01:32:35 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!news5-gui.server.ntli.net!ntli.net!news6-win.server.ntlworld.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: stu...@bigfoot.com (Stuart Moore)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Dead or alive...
Message-ID: <3bb...@news.ntlworld.com>
References: <4tc...@4ax.com> <tqv...@corp.supernews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 46
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:27:45 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.253.85.129
X-Complaints-To: abu...@ntlworld.com
X-Trace: news6-win.server.ntlworld.com 1001406442 62.253.85.129 (Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:27:22 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:27:22 BST
Organization: ntlworld News Service
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:7924
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post