Re: FOR THE LOVE OF GHOD, PEOPLE!!!! >:-(
In article <Pbm...@comcast.com>, Atlas Bugged <atl...@gmail.com> wrote: > ><jil...@tuells.org> wrote in message >news:13f...@corp.supernews.com... >> snippage... >> >> In article <pzRKi.21540$c_1...@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, >> Jette <bos...@scotlandmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>Of course the other option is to start some real conversations and >>>drive them out that way. Up the "signal to noise" ratio. Tricky to >>>do that with SG1 or SGA at the moment, but we could prove that we're >>>a >>>*community* and have some *friendly discussions* about other >>>subjects >>>we all have in common. >> >> Good idea. So, what do you think of any other shows on tv at the >> moment? I am liking the new Dr Who and Torchwood, but I think >> Eureka is getting a bit stale. > >I saw two Torchwoods and liked it, but I'm seeing many posters >complaining of violence against women? Is that true? Not in the two episodes I've seen. Supposedly, it is tame at the beginning and gets 'worse'. We'll see... >I am definitely not a WHO fan. It still looks to me like it's for >little kids, even with all the massive upgrades since they brought on >Billie Piper and Chris Ecclestien. Well, those two are gone now. It is relatively simple at times because the plots kind of seem like the same concept but it's got action and makes me laugh at times. >Disagree about EUREKA, It'll never be great, I think, but it has a >real fun-quotient, and I think it's rising. > >BURN NOTICE isn't sci-fi, but it was easily the most spectacular >summer fare. The two-hour conclusion was electrifying, and I was >truly astonished to hear it won't be back until next summer. That >said, the good news is that it was renewed hands-down. Hmm, I haven't heard of that. Was it something I could get on satellite? >Still, HOUSE is back, maybe the best show *ever.* I have seen a few episodes and thought it was 'ok'. I'm partial to more action type shows myself (like stargate and firefly). >> How are we going to know what else we have in common? Hmm, >> read any good books lately? :) > >Try SERENITY's novelization. A novel?!!? I'll have to check amazon! Thanks! Jill -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The colors blend, the edges soften. Swirling and mixing we are becoming white light. jil...@tuells.org
Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5365213bd55f2b90 X-Google-Thread: 1f47d1,98f2f0f310cdf30b X-Google-Thread: 105f10,98f2f0f310cdf30b X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,gid1f47d1,gid105f10,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-xt-sjc-05!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: jil...@tuells.org () Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.tv.stargate-atlantis,alt.tv.stargate-sg1 Subject: Re: FOR THE LOVE OF GHOD, PEOPLE!!!! >:-( Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:08:04 -0000 Organization: Tuells Homestead Message-ID: <13f...@corp.supernews.com> References: <edi...@4ax.com> <pzRKi.21540$c_1...@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <13f...@corp.supernews.com> <Pbm...@comcast.com> Reply-To: jil...@tuells.org Originator: jil...@tuells.org () X-Complaints-To: abu...@supernews.com Lines: 66 X-Original-Bytes: 3199 Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.ascii-art:379 alt.tv.stargate-atlantis:3119 alt.tv.stargate-sg1:5507
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2007 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.