Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 15 Aug 1998.
Re: Munging e-mail addresses

Re: Munging e-mail addresses

Matthew Thomas <mpt...@spamfree.land> wrote:

> Can anyone e-mail you? No. Even if they're really clever? No.  

Yes actually they can if they are really determined to do so, 
several people have done so quite recently.  

> I disagree. For example, Joris e-mailed me the other day to ask my 
> permission for him to include some of the a.a-a FAQ on his Web site.  
> Would that have been appropriate to post to a.a-a? No, because it 
> was a private matter between the two of us, and it would have been 
> quite boring to everyone else. So he unmunged my address, and e-
> mailed me.  Simple. People who want to communicate with you 
> privately have no such option.  

That's OK, as I've already said...my anti-spam method for email is 
very anti-social. Timo Salmi uses something similar and only 
authenticates certain people to email him.  

Freedom to email other users is a two-edged sword. I have had some 
quite unpleasant unsolicited email in the past from users responding 
privately to something I have written in public newsgroup 
discussion...usually an RFD/CFV debate which can become very heated. 

I post a lot to many newsgroups and readers hit their "Reply to 
Sender" buttons with monotonous regularity. What really used to 
irritate me was those who both email you and post publicly the same
message and do not tell you they have done it. Grrrrr.

I could, but do not, complain to ISPs about private email received, 
as many users do. Frankly, I do not want to receive such unsolicited 
email in the first place.  

Each user has to choose their anti-spam methods for both email spam
and newsgroup spam. Last year my junkmail had exceeded 150 per month 
and seemed to be rapidly rising so I made my choice of action.

I also choose not to try to email to munged email addresses. If you 
disagree with my choice then it is your privilege to disagree. 

If you choose to use a munged email address that is also your 
privilege it is widespread practice these days. My choice is not to  
email people with munged addresses.

+-------------+--------------+-------------------------------+
|  o o o   o  |  <o      o>  | Just because we disagree      |
| <><><>   <> |  /-+-- --+X  |  doesn't mean I have to kill  |
| ||||||   || | />        <\ |   you, unless I want to.      |
+-------------+--------------+-------------------------------+

Bye,

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b1b9b850038ab5a6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Colin Douthwaite <cfb...@southern.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Munging e-mail addresses
Date: 1998/08/15
Message-ID: <903...@mnementh.southern.co.nz>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 381483109
References: <35c...@news.teleglobe.net> <902...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <902...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35D...@iNOdirect.ca> <902...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35D...@iNOdirect.ca> <35d...@news.southern.co.nz> <35D...@iNOdirect.ca> <35D...@xs4all.nl> <903...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35D...@spamfree.land>
Organization: Southern InterNet Services
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980226 (UNIX) (SunOS/5.4 (sun4m))
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post