Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 25 May 1998.
nope. no more .sig material

nope. no more .sig material

thread drift alert! bweep! bweep! thread drift alert!

On Mon, 25 May 1998, Pete Casso wrote:

> > > I've seen them gang up and march however...
> > >
> > 
> > Hmmm.... would that be an ascii gang?
> 
> Those were the 'steingangsteins!
> 
  and if they had beer with them it'd be in steingangsteins' steins. and
if they were protesting prohibition and had beer w/ them, it'd be in
prosteinsteingangsteins' steins. and since they'd probably be in ascii
they'd be asciiprosteinsteingangsteins' asciisteins. and of course, if they
were made of re-animated dead tissue they'd be... (ok, you lure him away
from the computer with the cookie and i'll grab the keyboard)(thump! 
pow! $*&^* he bit me! pllumb thump!)

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,e801c3e930a0ec02
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: sgt pinback <rob...@project.darkstar>
Subject: nope. no more .sig material
Date: 1998/05/25
Message-ID: <Pin...@candela.dartmouth.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 356527019
References: <Pin...@tesla.dartmouth.edu> <356...@sympatico.ca> <356938EA.7A3@_NOSPAM_mindless.com> <356...@on.spammer> <356...@sympatico.ca>
X-Sender: rob...@candela.dartmouth.edu
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post