Re: Blandstein
On 17 Jun 1997 19:10:23 GMT, in alt.ascii-art pet...@aol.com (PeteCasso) intoned: >I just perused the comics sections of a number of newspapers (again), and >found bland cartoons all over, even from big names syndicates. Considering >the rather violent reactions to my own bland cartoons, perhaps this level >of blandness in newspaper cartoons is all that the general public can >tolerate? I think it's just that most comics suck, including once-funny ones. Consider 'Peanuts'. In the sixties, it was pretty funny. Now it's degenerated into nostalgia. It would seem that this fate befalls all cartoons dealing with youth or pets (and this is about 80% or so.) The worst thing to happen to the comics was Larson, Watterson, and Breathed all quitting within such a short period of time. ( I know Larson does calanders and Watterson does books, but it's not the same.) Now all we have is Dilbert and the occasional Doonesbury (which has degenerated as well). Of course, much of the blame must go to those newspaper publishers who keep constantly shrinking the comics. Watterson did an in-depth piece condemning this in one of his books, and I can't say I blame him for his attitude. There's really no space to elaborate or tell a real story, and so are reduced to the same old cliches since they take less space to elaborate upon. There is a special place reserved in hell for the newspaper publishers who decided to shrink the comics so much. Maybe new, creative minds are put off cartooning and go into other formats because they're appaled by the lack of vitality in the field, not only on the comics page, but also in the "journalism" practiced today in the U.S. I certainly am. (I should add that all comments above are directed at US syndicates and papers, as I don't read others due to a lack of foreign language ability.* Are international cartoons any better?) *Except for Tintin. He's cool. >Nice and not so nice comments welcome :-) I would say that, not being conformed by artificial format restrictions, you could do much better than these people. *steins are generally lame. But you have none of their excuses. Nobody edits alt.ascii-art. > ,, > ( "> W > ,(> )>| http://members.aol.com/petecasso >( ^^ > all original ascii art gallery > accolades from all over the world > People who think I take the funnies too seriously can... well, anyway... -- Soldiers! Destroy the republic! Overcome all ||o|| __________ free men! Throw liberty, hope, and faith out | \|| |ze...@az.com|____ of the state! Know that all men are your |___| +-Of course I'm | slaves! -- _Moreland/Fleischer Latin_, p. 138_|_0_|_zed+----morbid.--/
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,6fc8e52fab20384c,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: ze...@az.com (zed) Subject: Re: Blandstein Date: 1997/06/18 Message-ID: <33a...@news.az.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 249283297 References: <199...@ladder02.news.aol.com> Organization: Citizens Against Letting Spammers Live Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.