Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from de.alt.rec.ascii-art, 27 Apr 2003.
erster Versuch

erster Versuch

Hi,

leider finde ich die Bezugspostings nicht mehr,
wurde aber als Katzenfan dazu animiert, meinen
ersten ASCII-Art-Versuch zu starten :-)

Naja, nix Ber�hmtes, aber als Erstversuch ...

Ist die Mieze so okay oder habe ich "falsche"
Zeichen verwendet?

Liebe Gr�sse
Katrin

    /\_/\
   ( 0.0 )
    > ^ <  (
   (     )_/
   (m)-(m)    = Maunzepaul


    /\_/\
   ( 0.0 )
    > ^ <  (
   (m)-(m)_/  ... oder evtl. so als Vierzeiler

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: GERMAN,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: f7c81,4a9abac5b29f791d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7c81,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-27 14:34:25 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!ppp-62-245-149-125.mnet-online.DE!not-for-mail
From: Katrin Kurjo <kur...@muenchen-mail.de>
Newsgroups: de.alt.rec.ascii-art
Subject: erster Versuch
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:35:13 +0200
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <3EA...@muenchen-mail.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-62-245-149-125.mnet-online.de (62.245.149.125)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1051479264 10692704 62.245.149.125 (16 [10342])
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [de] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
Xref: archiver1.google.com de.alt.rec.ascii-art:4723
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup de.alt.rec.ascii-art in 2003 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post