Re: (little red) rooster
On 13 Oct 1997 02:48:30 GMT, you wrote: >miKstein, you may be interested that your little red rooster was rendered blue > on my aol newsreader, does _not_ look bad at all, but also not intended to > look that way either. Petestein, What happens when you change <FONT COLOR="#ff0000"> ? > ^^^ Did the rooster turn *red* now? Works in FreeAgent !^) > In a more generic sense, I am glad the html art postings don't get flamed :-) In a strict sense: I am glad my posting didn't get flamed :-) In a broad sense: I'm not really a supporter of html-code in postings to this newsgroup. Don't expect me to post a young Elizabeth with a golden crown and blue dress riding her red pony in the green valleys of Wales one of these days ;) I only dared to post the tags because they did not scramble the ascii_art_ and are easily stripped off. Greetz, mic >>Take one of the ff out to respond to proper email address<<
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,5dd97c0127543a1a X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: ffw...@dataweb.nl (miK) Subject: Re: (little red) rooster Date: 1997/10/13 Message-ID: <61ua9i$qc0$1...@news.Leiden.NL.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 280413910 References: <61mkbl$gpn$1...@news.Leiden.NL.net> <199...@ladder01.news.aol.com> Organization: NLnet Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.