Re: trying to make animaition
In article <NEW...@nassau.cv.net>, tbracken <tbr...@nassau.cv.net> writes: > __ \/_ > By tbracken (' \`\ > _\, \ \\/ > /`\/\ \\ Liz...@writeme.com > \ \\ > \ \\/\/_ > /\ \\'\ > __\ `\\\ > /|` `\\ > \\ > \\ > \\ , > `---' You did so nicely with this animation... gave credit at the end for creating it--- HOWEVER, did not mention that the gecko/lizard was made by me and did have the "jgs" on it when originally posted... from your post, it looks as though it was made by tbracken... :( __ \/_ (' \`\ _\, \ \\/ /`\/\ \\ \ \\ \ \\/\/_ /\ \\'\ __\ `\\\ /|` `\\ \\ jgs \\ \\ , `---' occasionally I wonder if I'm being too generous by posting all these creations and making new ones upon request. It really ticks me off to see other people's names on the things that I've made. I don't mind others using them- but give credit where credit is due... is it really too much to ask??? -joan -- , , /(_, ,_)\ DON'T MESS WITH ME... \ _/ \_ / I'M A REAL CRAB TODAY! // \\ \\ (@)(@) // joan stark \'="=="='/ spu...@juno.com ,===/ \===, ",===\ /===," ASCII art gallery: " ,==='------'===, " http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/7373/ jgs " "
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,5ca99573b99b704a X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: spu...@aol.com (Spunk1111) Subject: Re: trying to make animaition Date: 1997/05/19 Message-ID: <199...@ladder02.news.aol.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 242429151 References: <NEW...@nassau.cv.net> X-Admin: new...@aol.com Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.