Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 1 Dec 2003.
Re: REQ: Any Islamic Art Asciis?

Re: REQ: Any Islamic Art Asciis?

From un....@free.fr · alt.ascii-art · 1 Dec 2003 09:22 · View full thread · report
Bateau <Gam...@work.stomping.aza> writes:

> Muslims actually pay attention to the violent bits of their book.

You seem to pay attention to lots of hollow bullshit.

> Dickhead.

That's your real name ? Very pleased.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6dc8a25c7e8a1ea
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-01 01:21:27 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!lupi.matesco.unican.ES!not-for-mail
From: un....@free.fr
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: REQ: Any Islamic Art Asciis?
Date: 01 Dec 2003 10:22:23 +0100
Lines: 9
Sender: r...@lupi.matesco.unican.es
Message-ID: <m2v...@lupi.matesco.unican.es>
References: <5fj...@4ax.com> <d29...@4ax.com> <bq50of$1v9i6v$1...@ID-53633.news.uni-berlin.de> <q4u...@4ax.com> <m26...@lupi.matesco.unican.es> <9k7...@4ax.com> <_k8yb.1667$_P6...@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com> <f5v...@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lupi.matesco.unican.es (193.144.183.209)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1070270486 68985595 193.144.183.209 ([209838])
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Informed Management)
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:661
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2003 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post