Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 10 Nov 1999.
Re: Another Fungal Foray

Re: Another Fungal Foray

>
> : > ...YET MORE MUSHROOMS!
> :
> : YES! .. thankyou.
> :
> : >   _,---._
> : > ,'  ___  `.
> : > '_(|   |)_'
> : >    |   |
> : >    |___|
> : >     """
> : > A welder mushroom
> :
> : See your welder and raise you by two
> :
> :   _,-=-._
> : ,'  ___  `.
> : '-(|[_]|)-'
> :    |   |
> :    |___|
> :     """
> : A welder mushroom
> :
> :
> :       _
> :    ,'" "`.  ,--  Welder Mushroom wearing safety helmet with headlight
> :  _/__(O)__\_
> : '-.(|[_]|).-'
> :     |   |
> :     |___|
> :      """
>
> Remove the mask, and...
>
>       _
>    ,'" "`.
>  _/__(O)__\_
>    ( o o )
>     \(_)/
>      )u(
>      """
> ...a miner mushroom?

Yes .. a miner mushroom

Like the one i did earlier

  _,---._  ,-- Miner Mushroom
,' ,(O). `.
'-(-o-o-)-'
   \(_)/
    ) (
    """

Allthough I think mine look more like :

           ,-- Damn .. I can't get him to look like a doctor just right!
   ,(O).
  (-o-o-)
   \(_)/
    ) (
    """


> Then if he removes the lamp...
>
>       _
>    ,'" "`.
>  _/_______\_
>    ( o o )
>     \(_)/
>      )u(
>      """
> ...a fireman mushroom?

Yes .. could be..

btw .. the "u"'s .. I don't like them.
They don't show up just rigth on all font's
"v"'s make better smiles.


>
>      ,^.
>    _'-=-`_
>  ,' _____ `.
>  '-( O O )-'
>     \(_)/
>      )u(
>      """
>
> An attempt at making the mushroom look as though it's wearing a
> pointy hat, as opposed to a pointy 'cap' (that's the anatomical use
> of cap, as opposed to an item of headwear)

Nice.

>
> : >     .-.
> : >  .-'   `-.
> : > /  _____  \
> : > '-( O O )-'
> : >    \(_)/
> : >     )u(
> : >     """
> : >
> : > Mushroom wearing a bowler hat
>
>      .s.
>    _/___\_
>  ,' _____ `.
>  '-( O O )-'
>     \(_)/
>      )-(
>      """
> One possible re-didle...the tip of the hat looks great (crafty use of an
> 's' to create a rounded look), but I don't like the '/' and '\' one
> bit...

Look rounded .. it works .. not perfectly but it works for this one.

> : >      ^
> : >     / \
> : >    / * \
> : >   / (   \
> : >  /    *  \
> : > / *_____( \
> : > '-( O O )-'
> : >    \(_)/
> : >     )u(
> : >     """
> : >
> : > Mushroom wizard
>
> A couple of rediddles of the top part of the hat (to try and make it
> less pointy - the '^' also appears to be 'hovering' above the main
> hat...
>        _
>       / \
>      / * \
>
> The version suggested by you - makes the top look a little flat though,
> imho...

Yeah but i tried several solutions and this one was the least bad.

>
>       /^\
>      / * \
>
> ...slightly more rounded...

nope - still pointy

>        .
>       / \
>      / * \
>
> ...darn! That full stop is a little too high to finish the top properly
> - looks almost as pointed as the '^' version...

yep .. i use this combination for ascii i wish to have a pointy edge .. wont do

>
>
>  .'`.
> /    \
>
> ...although the above is probably the best, unfortunately the entire hat
> (and mushroom wearing it) would have to be widened by one character :(

Very good ! .. allthough you're rigth .. it's too wide.

> Just finished diddling that bowler hat, given me an idea for the tip of
> this hat...
>
>       .s.
>      / * \
>
> ...now, re-integrate it with the rest of the hat (plus mushroom
> beneath)...
>
>       .s.
>      / * \
>     / (   \
>    /    *  \
>   / *_____( \
>   '-( O O )-'
>      \(_)/
>       )u(
>       """
>
> ...any better?

:|  .... Nahh .. not really.

       )"(
      / * \
     / (   \
    /    *  \
   / *_____( \
   '-( O O )-'
      \(_)/
       )-(
       """

Hehe .. errr nope not like that *grin*


       ,".
      / * \
     / (   \
    /    *  \
   / *_____( \
   '-( O O )-'
      \(_)/
       )v(
       """

Hmm .. Hey this looks good !

       ,-.
      / * \
     / (   \
    /    *  \
   / *_____( \
   '-( O O )-'
      \(_)/
       )v(
       """

Also very nice ! . . .. real nice

       ,o.
      / * \
     / (   \
    /    *  \
   / *_____( \
   '-( O O )-'
      \(_)/
       )-(
       """

Hmmm err.. nahh ..

       ,=.
      / * \
     / (   \
    /    *  \
   / *_____( \
   '-( O O )-'
      \(_)/
       )v(
       """

Also very good.


I could go on - I think i like my third suggestion best.
BTW since i've already made Merlin Mushroom who has glasses on and this fella has none , he
could be the apprentice - All great wizards need an apprentice.
Now you just need to name him and give him a background story and or a line he could say.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,9e862485d920a429
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: "Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen" <REM...@CeeJay.findhere.com>
Subject: Re: Another Fungal Foray
Date: 1999/11/10
Message-ID: <80agft$cv8$1...@news.inet.tele.dk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 546690656
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911081600420.21266-100000@malcolmx> <807p0n$5kf$1...@news.inet.tele.dk> <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911092026080.12881-100000@xena>
X-Priority: 3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Complaints-To: Department of Abuse <abu...@news.inet.tele.dk>
X-Trace: news.inet.tele.dk 942196029 13288 195.249.198.192 (10 Nov 1999 01:07:09 GMT)
Organization: http://CeeJay.findhere.com
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: "Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen" <REM...@CeeJay.findhere.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Nov 1999 01:07:09 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post