Re: FAST BIG BUCKS
From Zeus Simeoni <zeu...@umit.maine.edu>
· alt.ascii-art
· 31 Oct 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
RaD Man wrote: > > You know what I think is really funny? Is how people who post this perpetrate > as if this was their own personal experience, being shared with us for the very > first time... Yet it's so obvious that it's a cut and paste of the last post I > just saw... Say...about 4 posts ago!! ;) > > It's a real shame... > > On Fri, 31 Oct 1997 02:51:07 -0700, zen2000 <ze...@rocketmail.com> wrote: > > %A little while back, I was browsing these newsgroups, just like you are > %now, and came across an article similar to this that said you could make > % > %thousands of dollars within weeks with only an initial investment of > %$6.00! So I thought," Yeah, right, this must be a scam", but like most > %ofus, but I was curious, so I kept reading. Anyway, it said that you > %send > %$1.00 to each of the 6 names and address stated in the article. You then > % > %place your own name and address in the bottom of the list at #6, and > %post the article in at least 200 newsgroups. (There are thousands) No > > RaD Man % ACiD Productions Founder % Artpacks Archive Founder > ACiD Productions' Website -=- http://www.acid.org > Artpacks Archive Website -=- http://artpacks.acid.org > ACiD Team RC5-64 ! The Distributed.Net Effort > http://rc5stats.distributed.net/tmsummary.idc?TM=493 > http://sinned.ml.org/rc5/ I have to agree with you. Although I can't stand people senselessly bashing anyone just because they don't want to get involved with them personally, I agree that all the 'cut-and-paste' mass mailings get a bit old. I read most of them that come accross my mail slot, (I get bored easy) and last week I actually saw one that was original! Granted, this was after seeing three 'MAKE BIG MONEY AT HOME' messages from three different people, the only differences being in the reply addresses. I mean, a bit of originality spices things up, right? Perhaps there should be a newsgroup for these people. Perhaps news:alt.chainletters-art would work. It could give people hints on how to liven up any chain letter! Maybe if people get original enough, some people will actually read a peice of mail called 'MAKE $50,000 WITHOUT LEAVING THE HOUSE'! (and to make the post somewhat relavant to this group, I changed my SIG) -- _____ _ _ _|\_, \ ..````----</ /(> \_` a\_ /) /|/\ `\ ` ` `, |/ / ,/ ,-,,\ ( ( ,( ` ) , `\ .'.\ \ ||_/ /-/\\ ` )/ , (\ |\) ( )\ | .' . \ \L/ /-/ ` \\__ , , /( ) ) ( \ / ) |_' . | ` /-| \ \_)\ /( ( \ \( ) V ( ```\___ ` \_L-=E, |_) / __ _ __ _ _ __ _ / \_.-..=` / {`` ''`' } :` _`' } /`} | ; Z `' \ <``\ / /--_/\ `) `-''-,` / | [_``` / ( ; ){ {``)_) `\ | _J` .'-_,/\_``> (/\ ,` ,` } _} { : | | `-,`-. | '._ -` \/--_/ `-` ) ,` ,` __ | ( _ : \_ / }/( ) } `. ` \ |_/ ( {_ `' _) < `~~ | \_ ` / | `' _/ '..../``> /`/ `--'`` ``'--` `-` `-'` `\\\\ w w http://www.geocities.com/athens/parthenon/9573
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,45362ec6318b4f2c X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Zeus Simeoni <zeu...@umit.maine.edu> Subject: Re: FAST BIG BUCKS Date: 1997/10/31 Message-ID: <345...@umit.maine.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 286266452 References: <345...@rocketmail.com> <345...@3com.news.internex.net> Organization: University of Maine Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.