Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 16 May 1994.
Re: Sigs... help please! :)

Re: Sigs... help please! :)

No offense...  But why can't you sniveling little begging lamers make
your own sigs?  This group isn't a ticket to internet coolness for people
who aren't creative or imaginative enough to come up with their own sigs.
And, don't be dorks and comment on mine either...
-Mike
-- 
    _____   _____   __   _____   ______   _____   ______   __      _____ 
   /  _  \ |  _  \ |  | /  ___> |_    _| /     \ |_    _| |  |    |  ___|
   |  _  | |     / |  | \___  \   |  |   |  |  |   |  |   |  |__  |  ___|
   \_/ \_/ |__|__\ |__| <_____/   |__|   \_____/   |__|   |_____| |_____|
      Michael E. Riffle                      ari...@u.washington.edu

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,f759b3a2653c0c8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-17 04:04:39 PST
Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.uoregon.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.u.washington.edu!goren1.u.washington.edu!aristotl
From: ari...@goren1.u.washington.edu (Michael Riffle)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Sigs... help please!  :)
Date: 16 May 1994 01:13:49 GMT
Organization: University of Washington
Lines: 11
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2r6hcd$ii...@news.u.washington.edu>
References: <Cpt...@sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: goren.u.washington.edu
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post