Re: spam the child molester matt parker off the web
From Rowe Rickenbacker <row...@blueyonder.co.uk>
· alt.ascii-art
· 11 Dec 2004 22:18 · View full thread
case of John F. Kennedy the debate still rages. Millions of words have been written-pro and con. Yet no one has produced a single piece of hard evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald was anything more than a psychopath acting entirely on his own. (p. 106) I could continue in a similar vein with excerpts from this book and I could also go on with more questionable aspects of Clay Blair's background. And I could then use this information, and the inferences, to dismiss The Search for JFK. I could even add that Blair's agent on his Kennedy book was Scott Meredith, who was representing Judith Exner at the time. But I won't go that far. I may be wrong, but in my opinion I don't think the book can be classified as a deliberate distortion or hatchet job. Although the authors are in some respects seeking to surface unflattering material, I didn't feel that they were continually relying on questionable sources or witnesses, or consistently distorting or fabricating the record. As I have mentioned, the book can be criticized and questioned-and dismissed-on other grounds, but, as far as I can see, not on those two. Dubious Davis Such is not the case with John Davis' foray into Kennedy biography.
Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: 104f05,95a186e93fd69caa X-Google-Thread: 1162c2,83698fbb00cc1830 X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,83698fbb00cc1830 X-Google-Thread: f996b,d755981cc7ca31e8 X-Google-Thread: 1083ce,83698fbb00cc1830 X-Google-Attributes: gid104f05,gid1162c2,gid10e07b,gidf996b,gid1083ce,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsswing.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!atl-c02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!p01!fed1read02.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Rowe Rickenbacker <row...@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: spam the child molester matt parker off the web Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email,sci.med.nursing,alt.comp.periphs.scanner,alt.ascii-art,sci.bio.ethology References: <e58...@posting.google.com> <e58...@posting.google.com> <e58...@posting.google.com> <col7u2$72n$1...@news.chatlink.com> Message-ID: <431...@individual.net> X-Newsreader: PostXpert (www.postxpert.com) Lines: 27 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:18:53 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.108.19.241 X-Complaints-To: abu...@cox.net X-Trace: fed1read02 1102806603 68.108.19.241 (Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:10:03 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:10:03 EST Organization: Cox Communications Xref: g2news1.google.com news.admin.net-abuse.email:270323 sci.med.nursing:4888 alt.comp.periphs.scanner:1070 alt.ascii-art:2501 sci.bio.ethology:488
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2004 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.