Re: Incredible! Anti-Gravity device works and is patented 01-31-2002

. wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Charlie Ebert <kd5...@mmcable.com> wrote:
> 
>>. wrote:
>>
>>>In comp.os.linux.advocacy Dr Scab <sca...@herpes.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 22:37:17 GMT, in alt.ascii-art,
>>>>(Charlie Ebert <kd5...@mmcable.com>) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Dr Scab wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Going by that definition, a helicopter counts as an anti-gravity device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You really are off your head.
>>>>>
>>>>>My goodness!  By your line of thinking so is the moon!
>>>>
>>>>The moon does not defy gravity. This new device does not defy gravity any
>>>>more than helicopters do.
>>>
>>>
> 
>>Having read the others comments about just because it's patented doesn't
>>mean it works, blah, blah, blah, despite the pictures....
>>I will say, shure!  I've seen transister radios and the like exibiting 
>>this kind of phenomena for years!  SHURE!  Just go to any park and
>>you'll see kids flying their high voltage UFO's all over the place.
>>They quit kites years ago!  SHURE!!!  YEAH!!!
> 
> 
>>This guy has had people all over the world repeat the experiment and
>>build their own.  Just check out the website.
> 
> 
>>So it works.
> 
> 
>>Now that covers their comments and now I will address my freind
>>yttrx's comments.
> 
> 
>>I have some respect for yttrx as I've been debating with him for
>>years.
> 
> 
>>Yttrx!
> 
> 
>>>Even anti-gravity devices (when and if they come to fruition) will 
>>
>>not defy
>>
>>>gravity, they will simply exemplify its properties.
>>>
>>
> 
>>Let me think here.  To be anti would have the same meaning as exemplify
>>in this case wouldn't it.  To neutralize!  But more than neutralize,
>>to actually repulse as it lifts off the table.  It doesn't just hover,
>>it can go up and down like it was climing a ladder.
> 
> 
>>But the comment about when and if they come is not necessary as the
>>issue is now in the past tense.  The technology has been invented
>>and it's working.
> 
> 
>>They are reversing the effects of gravity without the aid of thrust.
> 
> 
>>There is no thrust here.
> 
> 
> Perhaps not, but there is energy which is being converted to "work",
> obviously.  It is lifted off the table.
> 

The art of repulsing gravity could be construed as THRUST!
So I stand corrected.  It has thrust but the debate is what
kind of thrust.


> 
>>So, I'm trying to imagine what frame of mind your in here.
> 
> 
>>Are we in the same frame of mind or is there another angle
>>you're trying to represent.  Expound on your notion here.
> 
> 
> What im saying is this:
> 
> The thing that is being discussed here is probably not an anti-gravity
> device, since it is exploiting no known property of the force of gravity
> to achieve lift.
>


It's can't be because it's not known?  It can't be an anti-gravity
device because it's not exploiting something we understand?



> However, this does not mean that anti-gravity devices (that which can be
> defined as "nullifying" or "neutralizing" or "reversing" the *force of
> gravity itself*) are impossible.  If an anti-gravity device was somehow 
> created, it would not "defy" gravity, logically it would simply expound on
> properties of the force of gravity that are either barely-or not understood
> at all at this point.
> 


If the properties are barely or not understood at this point, how can
one conclusively say it isn't happening?



> 
>>Gravity is a mass attraction and it's been discovered how
>>to neutralize the mass attraction and this has implications
>>for the mass production of a great many things.
> 
> 
> It sure does, which is why it is essential that it is not discounted entirely
> as "science fiction".  Maybe we'll never come up with an actual anti-gravity
> device....But if we believe that it is not possible at all, we ABSOLUTELY
> never will.
> 
> Thatd be missing out on quite alot.
> 

They don't even know how electricity works yet we use it every day.

Nobody has EVER seen electricity nor understand the principles of what
makes it work?  Which direction does electricity flow in?  Negative to 
positive poles or the other way around?

They've never explained any of this and we've been using electricity for 
over a hundred years now.

The whole point is this yttrx.  I find it amazing the vacuum of people
who will just throw their bodies into this posture of "IT CAN'T BE" when
they themselves will admit, or in the case of Mike {FLAGULATE}, the
posture of the unknowning.

Like the born again christian {REPUBLICAN} fat asses who lay their 
body's down on the sidewalks and protest abortions and condumns all
day long, we have these hoards of people who have thrown themselves
into this mid-evil stench of catholicism and have proclaimed they
don't know what makes these things fly but they are god damn sure
it can't be anti-gravity because they know better!

Considering the parallel development model that Linux was indeed 
developed under, wouldn't it be a mid-evil thought of yours that
turning a notion loose to thousands of untrained inventors would
be an extremely bad idea.  Don't you realize that Thomas Edison was
indeed one of these dumb-asses in his day!

I'm sure you spend most of your life protesting some of the issues
I've covered, while breaking the same rule you protest in yet other
fields of endevor!

The bottom line here is NEVER SAY NEVER...
The second lesson is NEVER POOP in another man's cup unless you
can to educate.  And by the term 'CAN' and the terms 'POOP' I'll
let you put the rest together in your own time.  But you have to
have the experience to know how to put the two elements together
properly.


Charlie

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

  ___
  \_/
   |
   |jgs
 __|__
|  ^  |
\ \_/ /
 '._.'

Make your own ASCII art

Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.