Talk: New emoticon?
From chris verhoef <chr...@fwi.uva.nl>
· rec.arts.ascii
· 11 Aug 1994 16:58 · View full thread
· report
gra...@acsu.buffalo.edu (MJ) & /dev/emoticonizer write: >Well, I happen to <3 it - I think it is very creative, and *I* could tell >what it was before I was told it was a <3. I guess you just need a lot >of imagination in the first place, I dunno. I think it's <3ly. i think dis is not a question of beauty but a question of ecomomic usage of lingo: 4 me its now possible to express some feelin with just two characters but if no 1 is gonna use it im on a linguistic island... --chris Consistency is the last refuge of an uncreative person.
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,d9847af71823aafd X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-11 11:35:57 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: chr...@fwi.uva.nl (chris verhoef) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii Subject: Talk: New emoticon? Date: 11 Aug 1994 11:58:52 -0500 Organization: FWI, University of Amsterdam Lines: 14 Sender: bob...@gagme.wwa.com Approved: bob...@wwa.com Message-ID: <32dlcc$gp...@gagme.wwa.com> References: <325ser$pg...@gagme.wwa.com> <328v11$df...@gagme.wwa.com> <32bufh$91...@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
rec.arts.ascii
in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.