Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from rec.arts.ascii, 30 Sep 1994.
Talk: Posting scripts

Talk: Posting scripts

TPot (i92...@redgum.ucnv.edu.au) wrote:

> Ok, a while back ('bout a month) I posted a little script I have made
> that gets a random sig.  Somehow I don't think it got through (we have a
> rather bad news feed at times).  In case it did and no-one liked it I
> won't post it again, but feel free to ask me for it.

Ask!  :-)

--
Ryan Tucker			rtu...@worf.infonet.net
Des Moines, Iowa		rtu...@ins.infonet.net
	http://www.infonet.net/showcase/rtucker
 -=- Uhhh, huh huh, you said .sig.  Cool.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,1f69677d7ffe41f9
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,1f69677d7ffe41f9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-30 11:32:49 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail
From: rtu...@worf.infonet.net (Ryan Tucker)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art
Subject: Talk: Posting scripts
Followup-To: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art
Date: 29 Sep 1994 21:27:28 -0500
Organization: HoopyWeb
Lines: 16
Sender: bob...@wwa.com
Approved: bob...@wwa.com
Message-ID: <36ft2g$pm...@sashimi.wwa.com>
References: <366rbr$af...@sashimi.wwa.com> <369i8r$8s...@sashimi.wwa.com> <36a2s8$bk...@sashimi.wwa.com> <36decf$e8...@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sashimi.wwa.com
Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:1849 alt.ascii-art:12482
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup rec.arts.ascii in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post