Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 22 Nov 2002.
[request] General ackbar

[request] General ackbar

From BoD <Bo...@JRAF.org> · alt.ascii-art · 22 Nov 2002 16:19 · View full thread · report
I'm looking for an "admiral Ackbar" (from starwars) in ascii art.
You can have pictures of him here: 
. http://swg.stratics.com/content/lore/personas/ackbar.shtml 
. http://www.geocities.com/sci_fi_freak12/Star_Wars_Sanctuary-pictures-Ackbar.html
. http://members.aol.com/qtiekimmy/acky.jpg
and others from google.

Any size will do, I like the small ones (they can be used in a .sig)
but a "high res" version would also be great :)

Thank you very much !!!


BoD

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b4557f958ecfbf78,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-22 08:19:44 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: Bo...@JRAF.org (BoD)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: [request] General ackbar
Date: 22 Nov 2002 08:19:44 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <eb4...@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.155.85.185
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1037981984 6614 127.0.0.1 (22 Nov 2002 16:19:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: gro...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Nov 2002 16:19:44 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:20800
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post