Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from de.alt.rec.ascii-art, 9 Jan 2001.
Re: Body
On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 03:18:31 +0100, Stefan Lautenbach
<Ste...@gmx.de> wrote:
>  (.)(.)
>   )  (
>  ( /\ )
>
>Quelle ist mir leider unbekannt,

Jede 2. Klotuer in der Kneipe? :)

ciao
-- 
Philipp Buehler, aka fIpS | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p>
%SYSTEM-F-TOOEARLY, please contact your sysadmin at a sensible time.
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
        [X] <-- nail here for new monitor

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f7c81,988035afb32746f1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7c81,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-09 02:32:24 PST
Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!bignews.mediaways.net!fu-berlin.de!blackbush.xlink.net!serpens!pb
From: p...@usenet-jan-2001.fips.de (Philipp Buehler)
Newsgroups: de.alt.rec.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Body
Date: 9 Jan 2001 10:15:36 GMT
Organization: sysfive.com GmbH - UNIX. Networking. Security. Applications.
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <93eoc8$bpo$3...@serpens.de>
References: <3A5...@gmx.de>
Reply-To: Phi...@usenet-jan-2001.fips.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.serpens.de
X-Trace: serpens.de 979035336 12088 194.120.0.2 (9 Jan 2001 10:15:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: use...@serpens.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jan 2001 10:15:36 GMT
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (NetBSD)
Xref: supernews.google.com de.alt.rec.ascii-art:608
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup de.alt.rec.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post