Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 9 May 1997.
Re: ascii cow?
In article <199...@news.iup.edu>, 
"D.J. ROTIGEL" <csj...@grove.iup.edu> writes:
>Anyone have an ascii cow small enough for a mail sig?
>Thanks, DJ

 This cow has been around for a long time as both a complete
cow and head only.  The sig layout is mine, but feel free
to diddle your own design out of it.

                                 /;    ;\
-- Regards,                  __  \\____//       
   XEMoo.Moo.Moo            /{_\_/  \`'\_/__    (cow  by P.Kistner
  <dav...@xemu.demon.co.uk>   \___   (o\  /o  }   <upg...@sunyit.edu>) 
_____________________________/          :--'   ____________________
http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/   \_     `__\  ---[ now you've made me ]
                                  \___(o'o)    [_really MAAAaadd!___]
                                     `===='  

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6f4f45d37991c31c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Dave Bird---St Hippo of Augustine <dav...@xemu.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: ascii cow?
Date: 1997/05/09
Message-ID: <UA4...@xemu.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 240705024
Distribution: world
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk
References: <199...@news.iup.edu>
Organization: 1st Canine Chapel of Bob Dobbs Dog (Church of the SubGenius)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post