Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 29 May 2002.
Re: request: one line asci arts?

Re: request: one line asci arts?

Dirk-Lueder Kreie wrote:
> Dennis Kaarsemaker <cat...@usenet-nomads.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Johannes Ziemke schreef:
>>
>>
>>>have somebody some one line asci arts?
>>>something like a rose: @-->--->---

the rose looks imho better that way
		@>-,-`--

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d971285659d53ff1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-29 03:45:03 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.esat.net!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-freiburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Robert Leibl <rob...@web.de>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: request: one line asci arts?
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 14:31:50 +0200
Organization: Rechenzentrum der Universitaet Freiburg, Germany
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <3CF...@web.de>
References: <3CF...@gmx.de> <ad0...@kaarsemaker.nb.nu> <Xns...@news.deelkar.ath.cx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: java3.ruf.uni-freiburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:17433
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post