Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 25 Jul 1996.
Re: [Request] A sloth? Anyone?

Re: [Request] A sloth? Anyone?

David Wallis (wal...@surfplaza.com) wrote:

: I knew this would come in handy some day:
: Sloth:
:                   __
: ================={_ )====///==============================================
:                    ll   / /     
:                /\  ll  / /      POWERED By REAL SLOTHS!!!
:               /  \ ll / /       
:              / /\ \ll/ /               Donald MacDonald-Ross II
:             ///  (:___:)    ///        dma...@freenet.npiec.on.ca
:        __________l{. .}l___/ /         dro...@envirolink.org
:       ///---------\\_//_____/

	thank you  to an infinitive degree!  [sloths are timid creatures; 
they don't seem to like being in photos or ascii]
-- 
                           slo...@netcom.com
                    
                    "When you're clinging to trees, 
                       you're clinging to glory"

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b415fed5350e83e8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: slo...@netcom.com (KCSpindler)
Subject: Re: [Request] A sloth? Anyone?
Date: 1996/07/25
Message-ID: <slo...@netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 170060650
sender: slo...@netcom22.netcom.com
references: <slo...@netcom.com> <31F...@surfplaza.com>
organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post