Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 21 Oct 1999.
Re: Name that RFC

Re: Name that RFC

mic@dataweb.BOUNCE_SPAM.nl (miK) schrieb in alt.ascii-art:

>Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen wrote:
>
>>Found this in a RFC .. can you guess which one ?
>>
>>            ught i
>>          ca       n
>>        m            a
>>       '      ...     t
>>      I      .   .     i
>>             !         m
>>      !       !       e
>>       p       !pool
>>        l
>>         e
>>          H
>>
>
>20? 
>
>>HINT : It's _slightly_ ascii-art related.
>
>Give us more clues,
>
>please... :)

Get grep and a collection of rfcs. You don't need more to find out...

It's in rfc 1194 ("The Finger User Information Protocol"), rfc 1196
(newer version of 1194) and rfc1288 (even newer version).

regards, Wilfried
-- 
PGP 2.6.2: 2047/0xF5D18591/CEBD 3E8F B6DE 955E  ABA6 9396 1539 9350
http://www.toppoint.de/~wklaebe/

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,22f4fe69f4be88e8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Wilfried Klaebe <wk1...@orion.toppoint.de>
Subject: Re: Name that RFC
Date: 1999/10/21
Message-ID: <7unjf8$d1s$1...@legrelle.orion.toppoint.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 539080040
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7ug8gh$80a$1...@news.inet.tele.dk> <380...@NEWS.DATAWEB.NL>
Organization: alphabetisch ungeordnet
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post