Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 15 Nov 2006.
Re: a non tran non ascii fart

Re: a non tran non ascii fart

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Faux_Pseudo wrote:
>
> I saw this and thought of what it would be like if tran did farts of
> woodcuts instead of ascii.
> http://nelliebelle.livejournal.com/441415.html

Ah, yes.

http://marriedtothesea.com/

The archives are both ROTFLMAO and OMGNSFW.

-Arthur

Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: f996b,c83fb854ae87a590
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.aset.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!elk.ncren.net!usenet01.sei.cmu.edu!nn.andrew.cmu.edu!lmtp2nntp!not-for-mail
From: "Arthur J. O'Dwyer" <ajo...@andrew.cmu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: a non tran non ascii fart
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:54:18 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <Pin...@unix34.andrew.cmu.edu>
References: <_yx6h.64706$rU2...@newsfe14.lga>
NNTP-Posting-Host: smtp.andrew.cmu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Trace: nn.andrew.cmu.edu 1163570058 7122 128.2.10.81 (15 Nov 2006 05:54:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: pos...@andrew.cmu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:54:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <_yx6h.64706$rU2...@newsfe14.lga>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 128.2.10.81
Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.ascii-art:2643
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2006 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post