Re: Name in four lines - what to improve?
From Mathias Erhart <k3w...@bigfoot.de>
· alt.ascii-art
· 14 May 1999 00:00 · View full thread
· report
Thank you Laura, Ingo and "Spawn" for your suggestions! Laura, you are right, the "T" is a problem! In my reply to Spawn's posting you can see, that it's still hard to handle... I like your three line version, Ingo! Veronica Karlsson informed in a recent posting about figlet servers. There I found a nice four-line ascii version of "Mathias" in "bulbhead" style: __ __ __ ____ _ _ ____ __ ___ ( \/ ) /__\ (_ _)( )_( )(_ _) /__\ / __) ) ( /(__)\ )( ) _ ( _)(_ /(__)\ \__ \ (_/\/\_)(__)(__)(__) (_) (_)(____)(__)(__)(___/ -- .-. ,-. ,-.|"""""|,-, ,-----. ,-. ,--. | \ / |/ _ \"| |"/ �-� ,-..-'/ _ \ ( .-� | V | / \ \| |/ ,-, / _||_/ / \ \_\ \ |_|\_/|_|/ \_ _/_/ /_/ |_____/ \____/
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f996b,48ac75f510d9ae8f X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Mathias Erhart <k3w...@bigfoot.de> Subject: Re: Name in four lines - what to improve? Date: 1999/05/14 Message-ID: <7hgp39$c6t$1...@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 477745049 Distribution: world Sender: k3w...@bigfoot.de@bigfoot.de References: <7h9gd1$3no$1...@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de> Organization: (none) Look to Jesus! Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.