Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 3 Sep 1996.
Re: Could someone please make a good ascii of Doppleganger

Re: Could someone please make a good ascii of Doppleganger ?

In article <322...@news.mindspring.com>, Doppleganger
<ano...@anon.anon.non> wrote:
>My handle is Doppleganger   Could a good artist make a 
>ASCII sig of my name? Thank you!

I'm not a good artist, but have made some with the SigGen sig generator!
As they are too many characters (you might be able to make them smaller)
I have included them as a text file (NOTE TO ALL FLAMERS : It is NOT a
binary!)  Hope you like it...

[ Section: 1/1 File: dopple.txt Encoder: Turnpike Version 1.10 ]

begin 644 dopple.txt
<uuencoded_portion_removed>
+(`T*(`T*(`T*#0H`
`
end

sum -r/size 21216/2897 section (from "begin" to "end")
sum -r/size 61529/2081 entire input file

        Philip Taylor
phi...@songbird.demon.co.uk
  www.songbird.demon.co.uk

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,32a7a2b0e0474585
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Philip Taylor <phi...@songbird.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Could someone please make a good ascii of   Doppleganger ?
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <mqf...@songbird.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 179232640
distribution: world
x-nntp-posting-host: songbird.demon.co.uk
references: <322...@news.mindspring.com>
organization: Nightingale Services
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post