Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 22 Sep 2003.
Re: Updated Hollywood figlet font

Re: Updated Hollywood figlet font

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:25:43 +0200, Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen <new...@ceejay.cjb.REMOVE_TO_REPLYnet> wrote:

>lgbeard enlightented me with this :
>>>Here's an updated version of the hollywood.flf figfont.
>
>> It is by far a lot smoother to read. Put into Jave and tried it.
>> here is the result (___ not lined up. And there is a string error
>> at about 58 or 59, and also not being able to continue to the second 
>> line. String error continues with it. I like your version better not
>> so heavy.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>              .'``.                 .'            .'
>>            .'   ._)              .'          --.'--
>>        . .'       O  ____      .'  ____      .'
>>        .`---,   .' .'    )   .'  .'    )   .'
>>      .'       .' .'    .'  .'  .(___..'  .'
>> (_.'       (__(____.(__(__(________(__
>>                    .'
>>            ,     .'
>>          (____.'
>> 
>> 
>> lgbeard
>
>Thats odd.
>My copy in JavE produces this :
>
>
>             .'``.                .'          .'
>           .'   ._)             .'        --.'--
>       . .'       O  ____     .' ____     .'
>       .`---,   .' .'    )  .' .'    )  .'
>     .'       .' .'    .' .' .(___..' .'
>(_.'        (__(____.(__(__(________(__
>                   .'
>           ,     .'
>          (____.'
>

Tried again same results
>
>When you say theres a string error at about 58 or 59 ..
>.. what do you mean ?
>
>The linenumber ?
>The characternumber ? (in which case it would be helpful
>if you could tell me the character)
from the first line at 10

de.jave.text.FastStringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 44

second at 1

de.jave.text.FastStringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 71
>
>I too like that my version is smoother .. thats why i did it.
>Sometimes a style of drawing is a personal opinion

I think a style of drawing is a personal expression. To include diffculties
or moods for a given time for that indivaul. you should see minor changes
in most of anyone work. Some are major.
>  .. some may like it one way and some another.
>But here I felt the original style to be very rough and unnatural.
>
>I could also have choosen to make
>
>     ,'                            .'
>   ,'   lines , instead of my    .'  lines, but I tend to prefer
>,'                            .'
>
>the .' lines because even though the ,' lines define the line better,
>the comma char can in some fonts be very heavy or have curves that
>disrupt the line slightly.
>Mostly I like .' lines because I can slant them differently and still
>use the same line style. The ,' lines only go from left to right,
>forcing me to break the symmetry if i make a line go from right to
>left.

:) these do work better .'  This ,' or ." ," would look a little strange.
>
>
>
>Hmm ... I was didling a bit and found that " iy iy il ij" as input
>produces this :
>
>
>                                                       .'
>                                                     .'
>             O               O                  O  .'     O        O
>           .' .'    .      .'    .'    .      .' .'     .'       .'
>         .' .'    .'     .'    .'    .'     .' .'     .'       .'
>        (__(____.(__    (__   (____.(__    (__(__    (__     .(__
>              .'                 .'                        .'
>      .     .'           .     .'                        .'
>     (____.'            (____.'                      (_.'
>
>
>The original version 1 does this too.
>It seems clear to me that the y and j's do not try to cross the
>left boundary of the i when they are joined , but why does this
>not happen the first time ?
>Is it a font error or is it a bug in figlet or perhaps just JavE's
>implementation ?
>
>
>Hmm .. Just got this result of the polish figlet at :
>http://www.ascii.art.pl/figlet.php
>
>                                                      /'
>                                                    /'
>             O                O                O  /'      O   O
>           /' /'    /       /' /'    /       /' /'      /'  /'
>         /' /'    /'      /' /'    /'      /' /'      /'  /'
>        (__(___,/(__     (__(___,/(__     (__(__     (__/(__
>              /'               /'                     /'
>      /     /'         /     /'                     /'
>     (___,/'          (___,/'                   (,/'
>
>
>As mentioned JavE produces this :
>
>
>                                                       /'
>                                                     /'
>             O               O                  O  /'     O        O
>           /' /'    /      /'    /'    /      /' /'     /'       /'
>         /' /'    /'     /'    /'    /'     /' /'     /'       /'
>        (__(___,/(__    (__   (___,/(__    (__(__    (__     /(__
>              /'                 /'                        /'
>      /     /'           /     /'                        /'
>     (___,/'            (___,/'                      (,/'
>
>
>It may very well be a bug in JavE
>
>The online figlet however is still stupid enough to produce :
>
>      O
>    /'    /'    /
>  /'    /'    /'
>(__   (___,/(__
>          /'
>  /     /'
>(___,/'
>
>when given the input "iy"
>It does not understand that when it cannot push the y beyond
>the borders of the screen it errors in the joining of the two
>characters and must therefore move the i to match.
>
>JavE makes the same mistake .. it's internal treatment of
>borders might have something to do with this.

Never notice, li ti same results, 
>
>
>BTW .. which do you like better ? :
>
>
>                   .-.
>             O   .' .'
>           .' -.'--'
>         .'  .'
>        (__.(_____
>         .'
>       .'
>     .'
>
>or
This one
>
>
>
>                   .-.
>             o   .' .'
>           .' -.'--'
>         .'  .'
>        (__.(_____
>         .'
>       .'
>     .'
>
>
>(the size of the dot on the i is what separates the two)
>
>Sincerely
>CeeJay :)

lgbeard

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,f41d8fd4497d2d08
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-22 14:16:32 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: lgbeard <lgb...@bullregraud.nut>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Updated Hollywood figlet font
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:13:12 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <uom...@4ax.com>
References: <3f6db759$0$48906$edf...@dtext02.news.tele.dk> <4qj...@4ax.com> <3F6...@ceejay.cjb.REMOVE_TO_REPLYnet>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abu...@supernews.com
Lines: 191
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:24985
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2003 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post