Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 26 Sep 1996.
Re: ###CHERNOBYL: A NUCLEAR DISASTER###

Re: ###CHERNOBYL: A NUCLEAR DISASTER###

use...@host.com (Teek):
> The greatest commercial nuclear disaster, EVER.  [...]
> DONT MISS IT!!!

I don't think anybody will miss the "greatest nuclear disaster".
With or without Usenet.

Does CNN transmit the results of the Spam Trials yet?
"Film@11:  Public flogging of Teek aka use...@host.com"
"DONT MISS IT!!!"  ;-)

Sven

Followup-To: alt.stop.spamming

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1160c2,d41094cb2295f2f7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1160c2,public
X-Google-Thread: f9c8b,1050b83a7b0c42d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9c8b,public
X-Google-Thread: 107dd7,d41094cb2295f2f7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid107dd7,public
X-Google-Thread: 1157ca,d41094cb2295f2f7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1157ca,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d41094cb2295f2f7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: guc...@banach.math.fu-berlin.de (Sven Guckes)
Subject: Re: ###CHERNOBYL: A NUCLEAR DISASTER###
Date: 1996/09/26
Message-ID: <slr...@banach.math.fu-berlin.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 185569091
references: <use...@ppp83.monmouth.com>
followup-to: alt.stop.spamming
organization: Freie Universitaet Berlin
x-access: 16 17 19
reply-to: guc...@math.fu-berlin.de
newsgroups: alt.archaeology,alt.architecture,alt.arts.origami,alt.ascii-art,alt.stop.spamming
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post