Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 22 Dec 2000.
looking for a ascii art group

looking for a ascii art group

From obli <obl...@tande.com> · alt.ascii-art · 22 Dec 2000 17:21 · View full thread · report
hi everyone!!

i'm looking for a ascii art group to join up, do somebody knows one??, or do
somebody want create one??, i think that should will be interesting...

obli

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,e86d5a6e7abad059,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-22 09:34:35 PST
Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news-x.support.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.tele.dk!193.251.151.101!opentransit.net!jupiter.opentransit.net!m2newsfeed.uni2.es!newsfeed.comtenidos.com!m2newsfeeder01!not-for-mail
From: "obli" <obl...@tande.com>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: looking for a ascii art group
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:21:35 +0100
Organization: Wanadoo
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <9202lk$s7a$1...@m2newsreader01.wanadoo.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: usuario3-37-18-48.dialup.uni2.es
X-Trace: m2newsreader01.wanadoo.es 977505780 28906 62.37.18.48 (22 Dec 2000 17:23:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: use...@m2newsreader01.wanadoo.es
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 17:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Xref: supernews.google.com alt.ascii-art:3703
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post