Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 22 Dec 2004.
Re: spam the child molester matt parker off the web

Re: spam the child molester matt parker off the web

From Jimw <jim...@isp.com> · alt.ascii-art · 22 Dec 2004 03:05 · View full thread · report
SOMEONE IS USING MY NAME  The below was not me !!


"Jimw" <jim...@isp.com> wrote in message 
news:8134474357.6bb685ad782b3aca6be40cf2c22b0802@teranews...
> He even uses Priscilla McMillan to connect JFK
> with Monroe! (p. 244) Will Liz Smith call him on this? Will Ben
> Bradlee? Far from "protecting the Kennedys" the establishment
> shields these writers from potentially devastating critiques. The
> reason being that the Kennedys were never part of that
> establishment. No one protected JFK in Dallas. No one protected
> RFK in Los Angeles. The ensuing investigations did everything
> they could to protect the true murderers; to hell with the
> victims. And since the Church Committee showed in public that the
> Kennedys were not business as usual, there has been an intense
> and incessant effort to reverse that verdict; in essence to
> rewrite history. People like Slatzer, Davis, and now Hersh have
> made their living off of it.
>
> The Kennedys themselves deserve part of the blame. In Samuels'
> article in The New Yorker, Kennedy family lawyer Myer Feldman
> says that he advised the Kennedys not to even comment on Hersh,
> let alone sue (p. 69). If I were advising, I would have urged a
> lawsuit as far back as 1984 with both the Collier-Horowitz book
> and the Davis book. I would have loved to hear how the two former
> leftists had no idea that Priscilla Johnson was associated with
> the CIA, had tied up Marina Oswald for years, and then issued a
> tract on both Oswald and the assassination that James Angleton
> himself would have written. I would have also loved to hear Davis
> explain how he could have completely misrepresented the Church
> Committee report to his readers. I would also like to ask him how
> many people he thought would read the actual report versus how
> many would pick up the paperback version of his book (which
> features a blurb by Liz Smith). To me what these authors have
> done at least suggests the "reckless disregard" rubric of the
> libel statute.
>
> To be fair to the Kennedys, it is hard to castigate a family
> w
>
> 

Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: 104f05,95a186e93fd69caa
X-Google-Thread: 1162c2,83698fbb00cc1830
X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,83698fbb00cc1830
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d755981cc7ca31e8
X-Google-Thread: 1083ce,83698fbb00cc1830
X-Google-Attributes: gid104f05,gid1162c2,gid10e07b,gidf996b,gid1083ce,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!sam.nntpserver.com.POSTED!fecec02c!not-for-mail
From: "Jimw" <jim...@isp.com>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email,sci.med.nursing,alt.comp.periphs.scanner,alt.ascii-art,sci.bio.ethology
References: <e58...@posting.google.com> <e58...@posting.google.com> <e58...@posting.google.com> <col7u2$72n$1...@news.chatlink.com> <8134474357.6bb685ad782b3aca6be40cf2c22b0802@teranews>
Subject: Re: spam the child molester matt parker off the web
Lines: 43
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:05:15 EST
Message-ID: <1103684715.23cf55fd6ca379254a7771e5fca58116@teranews>
X-Abuse-Report: http://www.usenetabuse.com
X-Abuse-Notes: Abuse reports must be submited via the usenetabuse.com portal listed above.
X-Abuse-Notes2: Reports sent via any other method will not be processed.
X-Abuse-Notes3: Any other abuse reporting headers in this article are fraudulent.
X-Orginal-Message-ID: <Lv5yd.118903$%s2....@sam.nntpserver.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:05:17 -0600
Xref: g2news1.google.com news.admin.net-abuse.email:318374 sci.med.nursing:5128 alt.comp.periphs.scanner:1168 alt.ascii-art:2669 sci.bio.ethology:533

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2004 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post