Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 23 Mar 1994.
Why?
Okay, I have this here problem... I save some good ascii-art from this
group, then it looks great in my dir when I look at it... Then when I
download it, it gets at funny, and the <CR>s are not where they'r soposed to
be, like it's diagolal or something... What's wrong?
If it's the was I download, tell me... Right now I d/l by typeing:
sz -w 4096 <filename>
Please get back to me.
aTdHvAaNnKcSe

-- 
    /~~/~~/~~/~~  /~~/~~/~~/~~  /~~/~~/~~/~~                 
   /~~           /~~           /~~              <<<<   The voice of the 
  /~~/~~/~~/~~  /~~           /~~/~~/~~/~~      (.,.)    F U T U R E !!
 /~~           /~~                    /~~  ____ooO Ooo______________   
/~~/~~/~~/~~  /~~/~~/~~/~~  /~~/~~/~~/~~   whi...@bud.peinet.pe.ca      

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,9defb5318cdc720d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-22 18:21:04 PST
Path: gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.unb.ca!upei.ca!peinet.pe.ca!peinet.pe.ca!not-for-mail
From: whi...@bud.peinet.pe.ca (John Whitaker)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Why?
Date: 22 Mar 1994 22:21:04 -0400
Organization: PEINet, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
Lines: 16
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2mo92g$9k...@bud.peinet.pe.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bud.peinet.pe.ca
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post