Talk: ASCII art
Garfield told me that Felix Lee <fle...@cse.psu.edu> wrote: > >Lennert Stock: >>Heh if you want response to your work my advise is: don't do ascii-art. >>I get roughly .1 reply per post, my most favourite post was the release > >I see about the same thing. Not just for ascii art, but everything >else as well. I suspect the "bystander effect" may be a factor.. My experience has been that in most cases people will look at what's posted without commenting, unless: 1 The art is outstanding. 2 Flamebait is included (like the swastika stuff every 3 to 6 months). 3 It's an important topic (like a new ASCII art newsgroup). 4 Somebody show a unidentifiable piece and asks what it is. 5 Somebody makes a mistake and other correct it. 6 A request is posted. And the strange thing is, I can't tell some of the time what will or will not get a big response. When I posted a sig for Halloween that looked like dripping blood, I didn't think anything about it. To my surprise it got copied, used, and turned into 3 full alphabets, and made into 3 Figlet fonts. And my Web pages were the biggest surprise. I had no idea they would get used as they do. Absolutely no idea. Then there are times when I think something will get a lot of attention, and it doesn't. >Once in a while, I see a new sig that's based on something I did, >usually a cat. But a lot of the time it's in alt.fan.warlord, so I'm >never quite sure how to react. :) You must forgive the warlorders, they have nothing better to do. >>Anyway, the point is that you should just like the creating process, >>otherwise non-response, the passing nature of ascii-art, mutators, thieves, >>and the like will drive you (more) crazy. > >Yup. It's mostly just an occasional hobby for me. I do this stuff >for fun, for the challenge, and to learn how to draw. Flat surfaces >are hard to find, but computers are all around me :). Computers are great because of the control you have, and the ability of copying a file and playing with the copy to make variations. . /:\ //\\_ /;:.\ || _ //;:. \ ||.._ /'\\< \,,._-_ /'\\ /'\\._-_ /'\\ \\ \\ \\ ///;:.. \ '""|| || /-|| || || / || || || || || || || __--"////;:... \"--__ || || (( || || ||/ || || || || || || || --__ '--_______--' __-- ,-:;// \\,/ \/\\ \\, \\,/ \\,/ \\, \\,/ \\//\// '""--_________--""'
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,3663fe56fd9a1197 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,3663fe56fd9a1197 X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,3663fe56fd9a1197 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-16 11:06:57 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!Germany.EU.net! howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: bob...@wwa.com (Bob Allison) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: Talk: ASCII art Date: 16 Dec 1994 13:06:57 -0600 Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services 312-282-8605 708-367-1871 Lines: 57 Sender: bob...@gagme.wwa.com Approved: bob...@wwa.com Message-ID: <3csogh$l6...@gagme.wwa.com> References: <199...@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <3cnfsg$75...@gagme.wwa.com> <3cq58r$18...@gagme.wwa.com> <3cslof$j8...@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com Xref: nntp.gmd.de rec.arts.ascii:3361 alt.ascii-art:18181
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.