Talk: Should I html'ize the FAQ?
Joshua Bell: >I guess it boils down to: do you want just "eye candy" documents >which have no extrinsic value, or a useful resource document >which might be a little less compact and less cute, but is >useful? This is similar to the reason I hate the Motif look&feel. It's very heavy on eye candy that chews up screen real estate for no reason. But I'd argue the layout of the ascii FAQ is not eye candy. It's information-dense and makes good use of visual space. Perhaps the cost of doing this is too high, but that's for Bob Allison to decide. ascii art is very much concerned with visual layout, and it's quite sensible to apply these techniques to the FAQ itself. >The merged format may be pretty, but it isn't really useful, if >someone wants to extract text or artwork from the FAQ. It's only hard to extract text or artwork from the FAQ if you're stuck with oppressively linear text editors. Anyone interested in doing ascii art is probably going to want an editor with 2-D text support anyway. >Okay, okay, that's going to be pointless to convert to HTML. Not >due to any failings in HTML itself, but due to the conceptual >problems; you've already merged two types of information into one >(text and ascii-art into one plain text document). The equivalent >would be to take a magazine layout page, save it as a GIF, and >then complain when converting it to HTML would be a bother. but it *is* a failing of HTML. HTML is okay as a document-structure language, but it isn't particularly great as a layout language. It isn't rich enough to describe non-trivial layouts in a sensible fashion. You can't even do simple things like two-column text. So why bother using HTML as a source language for the ascii FAQ? now, going the other way may be plausible. Or perhaps using a third form that will generate both plain ascii and html... --
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,be7ecceadeff64b8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,be7ecceadeff64b8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,be7ecceadeff64b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-03 17:50:13 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: fle...@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: Talk: Should I html'ize the FAQ? Date: 3 Sep 1994 19:43:14 -0500 Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng Lines: 40 Sender: bob...@gagme.wwa.com Approved: bob...@wwa.com Message-ID: <34b572$ff...@gagme.wwa.com> References: <33tklt$i5...@gagme.wwa.com> <340s90$hj...@gagme.wwa.com> <34975f$if...@gagme.wwa.com> <34af74$5n...@gagme.wwa.com> <34b1p5$dn...@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:1519 alt.ascii-art:11748 alt.binaries.pictures.ascii:1068
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.