Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 17 Aug 1994.
Talk-Line: Which of these should be made into Figlet fonts?

Talk-Line: Which of these should be made into Figlet fonts? (30 K)

In article <32jk39$ra...@gagme.wwa.com> bob...@wwa.com (Bob Allison) writes:
>   Some of us have been talking about Figlet fonts quite a bit lately.  
>And there certainly are more fonts than ever before.
>
>   So since folks are always asking me if my sigs are made with Figlet 
>fonts, I thought I'd post a bunch of my sigs that could be made into 
>Figlet fonts.
>
>   The questions are:
>
>   o  Which of these should be made into fonts?

A comment first: a recent trend that isn't entirely to my liking is the
proliferation of figlet fonts that are essentially the same, but with
certain characters switched with others.

For example,

### # # ###  ##           %%% % % %%%  %% 
 #  # #  #  #              %  % %  %  %   
 #  ###  #   #     and     %  %%%  %   %  
 #  # #  #    #            %  % %  %    % 
 #  # # ### ##             %  % % %%% %%  

don't need to be separate fonts, since you can get the second by piping
the first through

tr '#' '%'

or whatever appropriate utility you would use in other OS's. Note that
many of the sigs here are essentially the same, and so don't need
separate fonts.

That said, I'd like to see these as figlet fonts:
>   __      __      __      __      __      __      __      __      __
>  / /\    / /\    / /\    / /\    / /\    / /\    / /\    / /\    /_/\
> / / /_  / / /   / /  \  / /  \  / / /   / / /   / /  \  / /  \  /_/\ \
>/_/ / /\/_/ /   /_/ /\ \/_/ /\ \/_/ /_  /_/ /   /_/ /\ \/_/ /\ \/_/\ \ \
>\ \ \/  \ \ \  _\ \ \/  \ \ \/ /\ \ \/\_\ \ \  _\ \ \/ /\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
> \ \  /\ \ \ \/ /\ \  /\ \ \  __ \ \  / /\ \ \/ /\ \  __ \ \ \_\ \ \ \ \ \
>  \_\/ / /\ \ \/ /\ \ \_\/\ \ \_\/\ \ \/ /\ \ \/ /\ \ \_\/\ \ \/ /\ \ \  /
>    /_/ /  \ \  /  \ \ \   \ \ \   \ \  /  \ \  /  \ \ \   \ \  /  \ \  /
>    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/    \_\/
>.    ____   ____ '   .  _______  .  _____ ____ ______     ______  __  __  __
>  ' / __/  /  _/ + ,/| /____    )  /  _/ /  _/____    )  / ___ / / / / /./ /
>+  ( (    / /    ,/  |   __ ) /   / /_  / / +  __ ) /  */ / / / / /./ / / /
> .  \ \* / / . ,/ _  |  / // / . / __/ / /    / // / . / /./ / / /*/ / / /
> ____) )/ /_  /,-' `.| / / \ \  / /_  / /_ . / / \ \  / /_/ / / /_/ /_/ /  +
>/_____//____///  .  ||/_/   \ \/____//____/ /_/ . \ \/_____/ /_________/ .
>  .        '          +      \/     , '       .    \/ .'   +      '  *     .
>         ..ooooo.
>      .d88888888"
>     .88P"   @"
>     '88b,,        ..     ..     ..    ..     ..    ..     ..    ..  ..   ...
>       '""*88b. .d888  .d888b .Bo88r .8P)8 .o888 .Bo88r .d888b..8@8 o8  o8P"
>            X88.8P'#`.d8" e8" 8")8" .8le* .8P'#' 8"X8" .88"8@8"88" 88' d8P
>     .oooood88"!8. .o88 x*8".Z" db.dX8'  .X8.  .Z" db z#8. .8P 8bd88bd888 
>  .d8888888#"  '*8P" "8P' YwP"  *8" '*88#' '888P"  #8*  "88*'  #8#  *8#
>
>     _mm_   _am,   _am,   _g_ag,  _am,   _am,  _g_ag,  _am,   ,g,   g,   g
>    qK. " ,gF  @._gF  @  ^ NX  #_gF ,@ ,gF  @,^ NX  #vgF  @_-dg#   g#   A@
>     *b,  0Y     0Y   d   dY    0Ew*"  0Y      dY    0Y   d  j#  _j#  _d#
>   ,  dN.jK   , jK  ,Z" ,jF    jK   , jK   ,  jF    jK  ,N  jN _*jN _*jN",'
>   *h,W"  N#pP   N#pY"W^ F      N#pP   N#pP   F      N#pP   N#^  N#^  NW^

				Glenn Chappell   <><
				e-mail: gg...@uiuc.edu

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110f55,807254962cb72288
X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,807254962cb72288
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,807254962cb72288
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-17 16:00:04 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail
From: cha...@symcom.math.uiuc.edu (Glenn Chappell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii
Subject: Talk-Line: Which of these should be made into Figlet fonts? (30 K)
Date: 17 Aug 1994 17:53:30 -0500
Organization: Math Dept., University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
Lines: 68
Sender: bob...@gagme.wwa.com
Approved: bob...@wwa.com
Message-ID: <32u4da$k1...@gagme.wwa.com>
References: <32jk39$ra...@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com
Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:1306 alt.ascii-art:11326 alt.binaries.pictures.ascii:1003
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post