Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 30 Mar 2002.
Re: Still would like a Gecko!

Re: Still would like a Gecko!

From LGB <nop...@nospam.nut> · alt.ascii-art · 30 Mar 2002 11:23 · View full thread · report
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:56:22 +0200, "Andrea Lachner" <dre...@worldno.spamonline.co.za> wrote:

>Posting my request previously did not get me what I was looking for.
just read your past post. 24 hours is not a long time to wait for a
answer ( newsgroup time ).
>Please could someone post a Gecko here?
>Not too big, and in plain font please.
>
>Thanks
>Andrea
>
check here 
http://www.ascii-art.de/
http://www.brak.strony.prv.pl/

lgbeard

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,faeac71562bfe753
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-30 03:25:27 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: nop...@nospam.nut (LGB)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Still would like a Gecko!
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:23:55 GMT
Organization: very little.net
Message-ID: <3ca...@news.charter.net>
References: <a845li$hsd$1...@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
X-Complaints-To: new...@supernews.com
Lines: 16
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16419

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post