Re: a better ascii-art Dot
From Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen <new...@ceejay.cjb.NOSPAMnet>
· alt.ascii-art
· 5 Jun 2006 21:38 · View full thread
· report
> no, the best dot of this all: > > _ > ,' '. > ! ! > '-' oh please .. that's just awful. Besides it's a circle. Like this : .-. ( ) `-'
Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d8ab949a997f7cd7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:38:36 +0200 From: Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen <new...@ceejay.cjb.NOSPAMnet> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: a better ascii-art Dot References: <44796417$0$32331$e4f...@dreader25.news.xs4all.nl> <e5c2di$a0c$1...@news01.versatel.de> <179...@520011603429.dialin.t-online.de> <114...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <44808b71$0$27536$e4f...@dreader29.news.xs4all.nl> <44841233$0$30244$e4f...@dreader17.news.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <44841233$0$30244$e4f...@dreader17.news.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4484a458$0$84038$edf...@dtext01.news.tele.dk> Organization: TDC Totalloesninger NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.50.78 X-Trace: 1149543512 dtext01.news.tele.dk 84038 80.62.50.78:5275 X-Complaints-To: abu...@post.tele.dk Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.ascii-art:1875
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2006 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.