Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 11 Feb 2001.
Re: [pic] Nude from before 1980

Re: [pic] Nude from before 1980

Neil Franklin a *crit :
> 
> MiKe® <Pei...@lascaux.cave> writes:
> 
> > > And the pages were attached to each other,
> > > bottom of one page to the top of the next,
> > > so that the output was one long page.
> >
> > > The unix "banner" program was written to take advantage
> > > of the long continuous printouts from those old printers.
> >
> > But as continuous forms are still in use - so are
> > those *old* tractor feed printers .
> 
> Jup.
> 
> > english measure suggesting that we change instead
> > to hexadecimal because ALL computers run on hex .
> 
> Binary, as you say.
> 
> > At that time VIRTUALLY all mainframes, the few that
> > were around, had 4 bit processors and ran on octal - not hex ?
> 
> 4 bit processors??? The only use of them I know are pocket calculators
> and simple control systems (say traffic lights) up to 10 years ago.
> 
> Mainframes are either:
> - 36bit (IBM 709 series (1950/60s), DEC PDP-10 series (1960s/70s), GE 6xx
>   series (1960s up to today), ...) or
> - 32bit (IBM 360 series (late 1960s to today), DEC VAX series (late 1970s
>   to 1990s), ...).
> 
> And don't forget:
> 
> If you are not playing with 36 bits you have not got a full DEC.
> 
> > virtually ALL computers run on BINARY only .
> > We humans merely use HEX(8 bit) or OCTAL because they conform to
> 
> Hex is 4 bits and usually used on 32bit machines (8 characters/word):
> 
> 02 46 8A CE       = 00000010 01000110 10001010 11001110
> 13 57 9B DF       = 00010011 01010111 10011011 11011111
> 
> Octal is 3 bits and usually used on 36bit machines (12 characters/word):
> 
> 01 23 45 67 01 23 = 000001 010011 100101 110111 000001 010011
> 
> > Therefore, a very popular DIP (Dual Inline Package) was
> > a BCD converter that input Binary Code and output Decimal .
> 
> Or even full hex.
> 
> > My first computer was 32 bit long ago before others upgraded
> 
> I started with 8bit, an Z80 running at 4MHz (but using up 4 times as
> many clock states as todays processors, so it is equvalent to an 1MHz
> processor today would be). Today there is about 5 times that computer
> power in an TV remote control.
> 
> > now 128 bit computers are around
> 
> Where? The best I have seen (und I use such daily) are 64bit.
> 
> Note: I mean real 64bit vs 128bit architecture. Actual memory width
> these 64bit machines are 256bit, and even 32bit mainframes have up
> to 2048bit memory width.
> 
> --
> Neil Franklin, nei...@franklin.ch.remove http://neil.franklin.ch/
> Hacker, Unix Guru, El Eng FH/BSc, Sysadmin, Roleplayer, LARPer, Mystic

Thanks for the info - and corrections .
I mostly worked with programming -
very little with hardware . I know the
latest mainframe when I was in school was 48K std 
expandable to a whopping 64K max. Three 1/2 inch
tape drives - program, data in, data out , with
program in 16K max. chunks .
The only z80 I owned was a small Sinclair that could
scroll a full screen of color faster than the first
ibm i used . In programmin an RS MC-10 in msbasic1.0
using boolean values as multipliers made a calendar
program print a calendar as fast as I can do it today .
Pascal for a pc worked great using case statements and
poking data into the non-user registers of a TI59
printed fast.  PCs today with the greater capacity
run better and there is no concern for memory .
Lower level programming is what I like best, though ,
as I did when experimenting with the TI59 and the MC-10 .

MiKe®

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: f996b,e084092f3d261361
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-11 04:08:56 PST
Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?MiKe=AE?= <Pei...@lascaux.cave>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: [pic] Nude from before 1980
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:08:31 +0100
Organization: Les Amoureux du Beau Chat
Lines: 120
Message-ID: <3A8...@lascaux.cave>
References: <slr...@ip55237.transbay.net> <3A8...@lascaux.cave> <6us...@chonsp.franklin.ch>
Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=EAcheur=40le=2Eouebe?=
NNTP-Posting-Host: d1.56.9e.94
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Server-Date: 11 Feb 2001 12:06:07 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [fr] (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: fr-FR,en-US,de-DE,gd,eu,pdf
Xref: supernews.google.com alt.ascii-art:4355
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post