Re: [pic] Nude from before 1980
Neil Franklin a *crit : > > MiKe® <Pei...@lascaux.cave> writes: > > > > And the pages were attached to each other, > > > bottom of one page to the top of the next, > > > so that the output was one long page. > > > > > The unix "banner" program was written to take advantage > > > of the long continuous printouts from those old printers. > > > > But as continuous forms are still in use - so are > > those *old* tractor feed printers . > > Jup. > > > english measure suggesting that we change instead > > to hexadecimal because ALL computers run on hex . > > Binary, as you say. > > > At that time VIRTUALLY all mainframes, the few that > > were around, had 4 bit processors and ran on octal - not hex ? > > 4 bit processors??? The only use of them I know are pocket calculators > and simple control systems (say traffic lights) up to 10 years ago. > > Mainframes are either: > - 36bit (IBM 709 series (1950/60s), DEC PDP-10 series (1960s/70s), GE 6xx > series (1960s up to today), ...) or > - 32bit (IBM 360 series (late 1960s to today), DEC VAX series (late 1970s > to 1990s), ...). > > And don't forget: > > If you are not playing with 36 bits you have not got a full DEC. > > > virtually ALL computers run on BINARY only . > > We humans merely use HEX(8 bit) or OCTAL because they conform to > > Hex is 4 bits and usually used on 32bit machines (8 characters/word): > > 02 46 8A CE = 00000010 01000110 10001010 11001110 > 13 57 9B DF = 00010011 01010111 10011011 11011111 > > Octal is 3 bits and usually used on 36bit machines (12 characters/word): > > 01 23 45 67 01 23 = 000001 010011 100101 110111 000001 010011 > > > Therefore, a very popular DIP (Dual Inline Package) was > > a BCD converter that input Binary Code and output Decimal . > > Or even full hex. > > > My first computer was 32 bit long ago before others upgraded > > I started with 8bit, an Z80 running at 4MHz (but using up 4 times as > many clock states as todays processors, so it is equvalent to an 1MHz > processor today would be). Today there is about 5 times that computer > power in an TV remote control. > > > now 128 bit computers are around > > Where? The best I have seen (und I use such daily) are 64bit. > > Note: I mean real 64bit vs 128bit architecture. Actual memory width > these 64bit machines are 256bit, and even 32bit mainframes have up > to 2048bit memory width. > > -- > Neil Franklin, nei...@franklin.ch.remove http://neil.franklin.ch/ > Hacker, Unix Guru, El Eng FH/BSc, Sysadmin, Roleplayer, LARPer, Mystic Thanks for the info - and corrections . I mostly worked with programming - very little with hardware . I know the latest mainframe when I was in school was 48K std expandable to a whopping 64K max. Three 1/2 inch tape drives - program, data in, data out , with program in 16K max. chunks . The only z80 I owned was a small Sinclair that could scroll a full screen of color faster than the first ibm i used . In programmin an RS MC-10 in msbasic1.0 using boolean values as multipliers made a calendar program print a calendar as fast as I can do it today . Pascal for a pc worked great using case statements and poking data into the non-user registers of a TI59 printed fast. PCs today with the greater capacity run better and there is no concern for memory . Lower level programming is what I like best, though , as I did when experimenting with the TI59 and the MC-10 . MiKe®
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f996b,e084092f3d261361 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-11 04:08:56 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?MiKe=AE?= <Pei...@lascaux.cave> Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: [pic] Nude from before 1980 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:08:31 +0100 Organization: Les Amoureux du Beau Chat Lines: 120 Message-ID: <3A8...@lascaux.cave> References: <slr...@ip55237.transbay.net> <3A8...@lascaux.cave> <6us...@chonsp.franklin.ch> Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=EAcheur=40le=2Eouebe?= NNTP-Posting-Host: d1.56.9e.94 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Server-Date: 11 Feb 2001 12:06:07 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [fr] (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: fr-FR,en-US,de-DE,gd,eu,pdf Xref: supernews.google.com alt.ascii-art:4355
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.