Re: a better ascii-art Dot
Christian St�ben wrote: > "Angelo" <ang...@lancop.invalid> schrieb im Newsbeitrag > news:44796417$0$32331$e4f...@dreader25.news.xs4all.nl... >> O >> >> done. That was hard. >> lol >> > I thougt that ascii art is some kind of minimalistic art. So the > better dot will be: > > . > > And YOU say you have done a hard job? MINE has been hard. > > ;-) Chris > greetings from germany > , Not again, I HATE wet paint! >:-(
Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d8ab949a997f7cd7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeedt0.toon.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: xhoch3 <xho...@safe-mail.net> Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: a better ascii-art Dot Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:42:09 +0200 Organization: T-Online Lines: 20 Message-ID: <179...@520011603429.dialin.t-online.de> References: <44796417$0$32331$e4f...@dreader25.news.xs4all.nl> <e5c2di$a0c$1...@news01.versatel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1148993103 01 16718 WLKTvE8v3n+yVK1 060530 12:45:03 X-Complaints-To: use...@t-online.de X-ID: rqD4J+ZJreOkPLn9kZvEMxZrTmAfb89lzZ+e1kqyxiCJ7bkopc2Zgk User-Agent: KNode/0.10.1 X-Face: &9dpplygc19YtN3i$-Y~Ah5%Kn%V&7Rju[,loFrwKw]7VAsEQ6~'I?bzz@0QsF!!P8.P&`z X-: Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.ascii-art:1845
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2006 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.