Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 4 Apr 2000.
Re: Detecting ASCII art in emails

Re: Detecting ASCII art in emails

Ian Howlett (ih...@ukc.ac.uk) wrote:
: I am currently designing the heuristics, or to put it another way,
: I'm trying to work out how you can identify the presence of ASCII art.
: 
: My observations so far:
: 
: Many non-alphanumeric characters are used.

I would bet that you could get fairly solid results if you searched for
occurances of /, |, and \ as your primary hooks.  Toss in - and _, maybe +
and some others (. and , and ' and = and others) if you like, or as a
lower-weighted factor for your heuristic, but in terms of raw efficiency,
the pipe and slashes are probably more omnipresent in ASCII art and
lacking in non-ART posts than any other characters.  The first 80% or so
of the search is the easist part.  :)

-- 
Joshua Millard == pul...@wpi.edu && www.wpi.edu/~pulp
            .-'-.   '-.-'   .-'-.   '-.-'
Yo' momma's .sig is so big, she's got to use a full screen editor just to,
um, edit it.  Yeah.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,c288d57efd7c580d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: pul...@WPI.EDU (Joshua E Millard)
Subject: Re: Detecting ASCII art in emails
Date: 2000/04/04
Message-ID: <8cdh7d$j6t$2...@bigboote.WPI.EDU>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 606725169
References: <38E...@ukc.ac.uk>
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post