Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 27 Apr 2000.
Re: Request: A bug

Re: Request: A bug

>Subject: Request: A bug
>From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=A3extendo?= nospam@reply_in.newsgroup 
>Date: 4/26/00 11:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <390706F5.81CDA714@reply_in.newsgroup>
>
>Looking for an ASCII bug, the creepy one I mean.
>Max. 4 lines. I tryed myself, but I'm not much of an artist.
>Who can help me?

     Well, I don't have anything creepy, but this is a beetle (sorta like a
scarab)

     Beetle
 AMC
  2       SSs.   .sSS
  0         `Y. .P'
  0          SS SS
  0  SS    .sSP YSs.    SS
     `b.  .P'     `Y.  .d'
      `*SSSS       SSSS*'
          SS       SS
      .sSSSS       SSSSs.
     .P'  `b.     .d'  `Y.
     SS    `*SsssS*'    SS

-- 
     .-~~-.
    (_^..^_)
      ||||AMC
*Tony's ASCII Zine*
http://www.zinezone.com/users/TonyCucchiara

*Shockwave.com Version 2.0*
http://v2.shockwave.com/

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,2d881a4b21c63569
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: ton...@aol.com.net.org (Anita Doobie - NOW)
Subject: Re: Request: A bug
Date: 2000/04/27
Message-ID: <200...@ng-df1.aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 616388832
References: <390706F5.81CDA714@reply_in.newsgroup>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
X-Admin: new...@aol.com

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post