Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 23 Apr 1996.
Re: biniary vs. in message

Re: biniary vs. in message

On Mon, 22 Apr 1996, Magnus wrote:

> I'm seeing alot of good ascii art being posted.. but my copy of Agent
> screws some of them up... wouldn't it be better to post large ascii
> art messages as biniary attatchments?
> 
> 
	YES YES YES YES YES!! KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE STILL SOME OF 
US WHO CANNOT DECODE THAT STUFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ATTACHMENTS!!!!


      ____________
======\         //================Micah AKA Gambit==============
=======\       //=============von...@freenet.msp.mn.us===========
========\     //======http://www.wavefront.com/~vono/planetv====
=========\   //=================================================
           \/

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,a9edb6fc551e8985
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Micah D Vono <von...@freenet.msp.mn.us>
Subject: Re: biniary vs. in message
Date: 1996/04/23
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91r.960423201938.22045C-100000@freenet>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 151079270
references: <317bf124.370848262@206.74.59.105>
x-sender: vonom@freenet
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
organization: gofast.net -- ISDN ISP for MPLS/STPL
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post