Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 3 Sep 1998.
Re: Artists Wanted

Re: Artists Wanted

Yury (Giver) wrote:
> 
> Yo can anyone be kind enough to help a new WaReZ group with some phat
> computer art or some macros?
> 
> If you can help me and many others out... please contact me at
> WC1...@aol.com and tat...@webspan.net.
> 
> If you are able to help... please try to make something of the word
> "GIVER"
> 
>                                                  Thank you...
> 
> -GIVER-

isn't Warez illegal in most countries so you could be prosecuted if you
respond to this post and add art to his site you can be considered a
co-conspireater.

P.S. no I don't work for the government in fact I have had warez on my
computer but I have none now

-- 
 _/|         BEWARE OF DOG
/  o'-.__
    ,,,,,\  Matthew Schneider
  ______,'      Student
_/mS        psy...@usa.net

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,852c43f3b1584d25
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Matthew Schneider <psy...@usa.net>
Subject: Re: Artists Wanted
Date: 1998/09/03
Message-ID: <35E...@usa.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 387682489
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: elmo.cadvision.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <35E...@webspan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: CADVision Development Corporation (http://www.cadvision.com/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post