Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 30 Aug 1996.
RE:GARFIELD PIC REQUIRED

RE:GARFIELD PIC REQUIRED

In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960827123558.4426F-100000@mercury> 

On Tue, 27 Aug 1996, Ang Puay Hin wrote:

> 
>  
> 	CAN ANYONE SEND ME A PICTURE OF GARFIELD NOT BIGGER THAN A SCREEN.
> 
> 	THANKS A LOT.
> 
> 

                  --      --
                .:"  | .:'" |
              --  ___   ___  -
            /:.  / . \ / . \ .\
           |:|. ;\___/O\___/  :| 
           |:|. |  `__|__'  | .| 
           |:|.  \_,     ,_/  / 
            \______       |__/  
             |:.           \     
            /.:,|  |        \   
           /.:,.|  |         \     
          |::.. \_;_\-;       |      
     _____|::..    .::|       |  
   /   ----,     .::/__,    /__,     
   \_______|,...____;_;_|../_;_|

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,20818e1d003aba6b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Malcolm  <s42...@mercury.np.ac.sg>
Subject: RE:GARFIELD PIC REQUIRED
Date: 1996/08/30
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960830111556.2752C-100000@mercury>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 177313007
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960827123558.4426F-100000@mercury>
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
organization: Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
nntp-posting-user: s4202110

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post